ArticleArchives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation2021
mHealth Intervention Applications for Adults Living With the Effects of Stroke: A Scoping Review.
Article in Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Effectiveness of mobile application interventions for stroke survivors: systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2024Pooled it
- Feasibility of Wearable Devices for Motivating Post-Stroke Patients.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Trial
- Trial
- Acceptability and Willingness to Use the "CaknaStrok" Mobile Health Application and Associated Factors Among Informal Caregivers of Post-Stroke Patients in Malaysia: Protocol for an Explanatory Sequential Mixed-Methods Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Telerehabilitation Following Stroke: Development of Training Content and Evaluation of an App-Based Training Program.JMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies · 2026Article
- Experiences of Navigating Recovery After Stroke in Tanzania: A Descriptive Qualitative Study.Nursing research and practice · 2026Article
- Occupational Therapists' Experiences and Perspectives About Using Apps in Neurorehabilitation in India: A Qualitative Study Protocol.MethodsX · 2025Article
- mHealth Apps for Family Caregivers of Stroke Patients: A Systematic Review.Iranian journal of public health · 2025Review
- Quantitative Evaluation of Postural SmartVest's Multisensory Feedback for Affordable Smartphone-Based Post-Stroke Motor Rehabilitation.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Article
- Older adult stroke survivors' needs and perspectives of a stroke app: a qualitative study.BMC geriatrics · 2025Article
- Feasibility of Smartphone-Based Exercise Training Integrated with Functional Electrical Stimulation After Stroke (SETS): A Preliminary Study.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Wearable Smartphone-Based Multisensory Feedback System for Torso Posture Correction: Iterative Design and Within-Subjects Study.JMIR aging · 2025Article
- Review
- Motivational strategies used by health care professionals in stroke survivors in rehabilitation: a scoping review of experimental studies.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- Mobile Technology-Based Interventions for Stroke Self-Management Support: Scoping Review.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2023Article
- A scoping review of 'Pacing' for management of Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS): lessons learned for the long COVID pandemic.Journal of translational medicine · 2023Article
- Technologies in Home-Based Digital Rehabilitation: Scoping Review.JMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies · 2023Article
- Use of the Digital Assistant Vigo in the Home Environment for Stroke Recovery: Focus Group Discussion With Specialists Working in Neurorehabilitation.JMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies · 2023Article
- Computer-assisted cognitive rehabilitation in neurological patients: state-of-art and future perspectives.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo conduct a scoping review of mobile health (mHealth) application (app) interventions to support needs of adults living with the effects of stroke reported in the literature. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), and Scopus were systematically searched for peer-reviewed publications. Articles were published between January 2007 and September 2020 and met predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. STUDY SELECTION: Articles included were written in English language, involved adults older than 18 years, and described an mHealth app specifically tested and/or developed as an intervention for someone with stroke to be used remotely and/or independently without constant provider supervision or assistance. Articles were excluded if they focused on acute management of stroke only, focused on primary prevention, were animal studies, were not an app for smartphone or tablet, and did not describe an empirical study. DATA EXTRACTION: Two researchers independently screened titles and abstracts for inclusion. The full-text articles were then reviewed for eligibility by the research team. Data were extracted and verified by a third reviewer. DATA SYNTHESIS: The search yielded 2123 studies and 49 were included for data extraction. The findings reveal that a global surge of studies on mHealth apps for people with stroke have emerged within the past 2 years. Most studies were developed for persons with stroke in the United States and the primary content foci included upper extremity function (31.5%); lower extremity function (5.3%); general exercise, physical activity, and/or functional mobility (23.7%); trunk control (5.3%); medical management and secondary prevention (26.3%); language and speech skills (20.5%); cognitive skills (7.9%); general disability and activities of daily living (5.3%); and home safety (2.6%). Of the included studies, a majority were preliminary in nature, with 36.7% being categorized as pilot or feasibility trials and 24.4% discussing initial design, development, and/or refinement.
conclusionsResults from this study reveal that the number of apps specifically developed for people with stroke and described in the scientific literature are growing exponentially. The apps have widely varied content to meet the needs of persons with stroke; however, the studies are generally preliminary in nature, focusing on development, usability, and initial pilot testing. This review highlights the need for additional research and development of mHealth apps targeted for adults with stroke. Development should consider the various and complex needs of people living with the effects of chronic stroke, while large-scale trials are needed to build on the existing evidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.