ReviewCJC open2021
The Canadian Women's Heart Health Alliance Atlas on the Epidemiology, Diagnosis, and Management of Cardiovascular Disease in Women-Chapter 3: Patient Perspectives.
Review in CJC open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Impact of Secondary Amenorrhea on Cardiovascular Disease Risk in Physically Active Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2024Pooled it
- Evaluating a Preventive Heart Health Program for Women at Midlife: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Pilot Study.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- Women's Cardiovascular Health and Cardiac Rehabilitation: a Priority-setting Partnership.CJC open · 2026Article
- Effectiveness of Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing as an Incentive to Enhance Outpatient Cardiac Rehabilitation Participation in Acute Coronary Syndrome Survivors: A Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial with Determinant Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Peer Support for Women with Heart Disease: Program Description and Evaluation of Women@Heart.CJC open · 2025Article
- Cardiac Rehabilitation Trends Among Commercially Insured Adults in the United States, 2017-2023.Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes · 2025Article
- Sex and gender differences in the associations between psychosocial stressors at work and coronary heart disease incidence: An 18-year longitudinal study of 5192 Canadian workers.American journal of preventive cardiology · 2025Article
- Women Managing Heart Disease: Involvement of Spouse and Non-Spouse Care Partners.American journal of lifestyle medicine · 2025Article
- Development and Systematic Evaluation of a Progressive Web Application for Women With Cardiac Pain: Usability Study.JMIR human factors · 2025Article
- 41Bridging the gender gap in Cardiac Rehabilitation. The first step: The equal opportunities project.International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention · 2024Review
- Review
- Review
- Article
- At the Heart of Resilience: Empowering Women's Agency in Navigating Cardiovascular Disease.CJC open · 2024Review
- Myocardial Infarction Within 30 Days of Discharge From an Emergency Department: A Descriptive Study of Albertan Women.CJC open · 2024Article
- The Development of a Chest-Pain Protocol for Women Presenting to the Emergency Department.CJC open · 2024Review
- Review
- Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Novel and Traditional Risk Factors in Middle Eastern Young Women. The ANCORS-YW Study.Global heart · 2024Article
- Direct medical costs of cardiovascular diseases: Do cost components vary according to sex and age?PloS one · 2024Article
- Gender disparities in the mediating role of symptom knowledge level in reducing acute coronary syndrome (ACS) decision delay: Findings from a community-based study in China.BMC emergency medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In recent years, public awareness campaigns have targeted knowledge gaps and inequities in care while focusing on the unique female experience and heightened cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk profile. Recognizing and understanding the sex and gender constructs, barriers, facilitators, and factors that affect access, treatment, and recovery after an acute cardiac event from the unique patient perspective is a key step in transforming clinical practice and care patterns. The aim of this atlas chapter is to provide a knowledge review and to identify gaps regarding the experience of living with CVD from the perspective of the female survivor. The sections are as follows: (1) experiencing and living with CVD as a woman; (2) "stopped at the gate": barriers to accessing acute cardiovascular care; and (3) action items to "open the gate" to women: what our patients want and need. The final section culminates with targeted recommendations stemming from recent literature and most importantly, from women with the lived experience of CVD.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.