ReviewJOR spine2021
A challenging playing field: Identifying the endogenous impediments to annulus fibrosus repair.
Review in JOR spine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Enzymatic chemonucleolysis for lumbar disc herniation-an assessment of historical and contemporary efficacy and safety: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Scientific reports · 2024Pooled it
- Translational hydrogel platform for durable sealing and mechanical restoration of annular defects.Materials today. Bio · 2026Article
- Hydrogel adhesives with a hydrodynamically induced liquid-solid transition for annular fissure sealing and inflammation modulation following microdiscectomy.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2025Article
- Exploring the Causes of Intervertebral Disc Annulus Fibrosus Impairment.Cellular and molecular bioengineering · 2025Review
- A novel rat model of lumbar disc herniation induced by puncture: accurate positioning and controllable degree of herniation.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025Article
- Annulus Fibrosus Repair via Interpenetration of a Non-Woven Scaffold Supports Tissue Integration and Prevents Re-Herniation.JOR spine · 2025Article
- Polyphenol and metal ion-reinforced supermolecular hydrogels incorporating nanofiber drug and peptide for annulus fibrosus regeneration.Theranostics · 2025Article
- Developmental morphogens direct human induced pluripotent stem cells toward an annulus fibrosus-like cell phenotype.JOR spine · 2024Article
- Design principles in mechanically adaptable biomaterials for repairing annulus fibrosus rupture: A review.Bioactive materials · 2024Review
- Core-shell oxygen-releasing fibers for annulus fibrosus repair in the intervertebral disc of rats.Materials today. Bio · 2023Article
- Recent advances in the repair of degenerative intervertebral disc for preclinical applications.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Review
- Immune exposure: how macrophages interact with the nucleus pulposus.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Review
- A challenging playing field: Identifying the endogenous impediments to annulus fibrosus repair.JOR spine · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Intervertebral disc (IVD) herniations, caused by annulus fibrosus (AF) tears that enable disc tissue extrusion beyond the disc space, are very prevalent, especially among adults in the third to fifth decade of life. Symptomatic herniations, in which the extruded tissue compresses surrounding nerves, are characterized by back pain, numbness, and tingling and can cause extreme physical disability. Patients whose symptoms persist after nonoperative intervention may undergo surgical removal of the herniated tissue via microdiscectomy surgery. The AF, however, which has a poor endogenous healing ability, is left unrepaired increasing the risk for re-herniation and pre-disposing the IVD to degenerative disc disease. The lack of understanding of the mechanisms involved in native AF repair limits the design of repair systems that overcome the impediments to successful AF restoration. Moreover, the complexity of the AF structure and the challenging anatomy of the repair environment represents a significant challenge for the design of new repair devices. While progress has been made towards the development of an effective AF repair technique, these methods have yet to demonstrate long-term repair and recovery of IVD biomechanics. In this review, the limitations of endogenous AF healing are discussed and key cellular events and factors involved are highlighted to identify potential therapeutic targets that can be integrated into AF repair methods. Clinical repair strategies and their limitations are described to further guide the design of repair approaches that effectively restore native tissue structure and function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.