Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33778374›Full record

ArticleSN comprehensive clinical medicine2021

Compassionate Use of Rectal Ozone (O

Marcos Edgar Fernández-Cuadros, María Jesús Albaladejo-Florín, Sandra Álava-Rabasa, Juan Gallego-Galiana, Gerardo Fabiel Pérez-Cruz, Isabel Usandizaga-Elio, Enrique Pacios, David E Torres-García, Daiana Peña-Lora, Luz Casique-Bocanegra and 3 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SN comprehensive clinical medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Compassionate Use of Rectal Ozone (OSN comprehensive clinical medicine · 2021
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marcos Edgar Fernández-CuadrosServicio de Medicina Física y Rehabilitación, Hospital Universitario Santa Cristina, Calle del Maestro Vives 2 y 3, 28009 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6153-9075
María Jesús Albaladejo-FlorínServicio de Medicina Física y Rehabilitación, Hospital Universitario Santa Cristina, Calle del Maestro Vives 2 y 3, 28009 Madrid, Spain.
Sandra Álava-RabasaServicio de Medicina Física y Rehabilitación, Hospital Universitario Santa Cristina, Calle del Maestro Vives 2 y 3, 28009 Madrid, Spain.
Juan Gallego-GalianaServicio de Medicina Interna, Hospital Universitario Santa Cristina, Madrid, Spain.
Gerardo Fabiel Pérez-CruzServicio de Medicina Interna, Hospital Universitario Santa Cristina, Madrid, Spain.
Isabel Usandizaga-ElioServicio de Medicina Interna, Hospital Universitario Santa Cristina, Madrid, Spain.
Enrique PaciosServicio de Medicina Interna, Hospital Universitario Santa Cristina, Madrid, Spain.
David E Torres-GarcíaUnidad de Geriatría, Hospital Universitario Santa Cristina, Madrid, Spain.
Daiana Peña-LoraUnidad de Geriatría, Hospital Universitario Santa Cristina, Madrid, Spain.
Luz Casique-BocanegraGabinete Medico Zamora, Zamora, Spain.
María Jesús López-MuñozServicio de Farmacia Hospitalaria, Hospital Universitario Santa Cristina, Madrid, Spain.
Javier Rodríguez-de-CíaServicio de Laboratorio Clínico, Hospital Universitario Santa Cristina, Madrid, Spain.
Olga Susana Pérez-MoroServicio de Medicina Física y Rehabilitación, Hospital Universitario Santa Cristina, Calle del Maestro Vives 2 y 3, 28009 Madrid, Spain.
Hospital Universitario Santa Cristina · ESHospital Virgen de la Concha · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate effect of rectal ozone in severe COVID-19 pneumonia and to compare it to standard of care (SOC). Material and Methods: In a case-control study, 14 patients with severe bilateral COVID-19 pneumonia (positive RT-PCR), treated with SOC and rectal ozone, were evaluated before-and-after treatment and compared with SOC (14 patients) in a 10-day follow-up period. Ozone protocol consisted of 8 sessions (1 session/day) of intra-rectal ozone (150 mL volume, 35 μg/mL concentration [5.25mg total dose]). The SOC protocol included O Results: At baseline, ozone/SOC groups were not different on age, comorbidities, O Conclusion: Compassionate use of rectal ozone improved O

Indexed as

COVID-19OzoneOzone therapyPneumoniaRectal insufflationSARS-Cov-2

Identifiers

PMID33778374
PMCPMC7984736
OpenAlexW3135405209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.