Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33778360›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental epidemiology (Philadelphia, Pa.)2021

Maternal proximity to Central Appalachia surface mining and birth outcomes.

Lauren G Buttling, Molly X McKnight, Korine N Kolivras, Shyam Ranganathan, Julia M Gohlke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental epidemiology (Philadelphia, Pa.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lauren G ButtlingDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia.
Molly X McKnightDepartment of Geography, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia.
Korine N KolivrasDepartment of Geography, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia.
Shyam RanganathanDepartment of Statistics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia.
Julia M GohlkeDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia.

Funding

Spatiotemporal analysis of adverse birth outcomes in Central AppalachiaR21ES028396 · NIEHS · VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INST AND ST UNIV · PI GOHLKE, JULIA M · 2018 to 2019
$426k
NIEHS NIH HHS R21 ES028396
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Maternal residency in Central Appalachia counties with coal production has been previously associated with increased rates of low birth weight (LBW). To refine the relationship between surface mining and birth outcomes, this study employs finer spatiotemporal estimates of exposure.

methodsWe developed characterizations of annual surface mining boundaries in Central Appalachia between 1986 and 2015 using Landsat data. Maternal address on birth records was geocoded and assigned amount of surface mining within a 5 km radius of residence (street-level). Births were also assigned the amount of surface mining within residential ZIP code tabulation area (ZCTA). Associations between exposure to active mining during gestation year and birth weight, LBW, preterm birth (PTB), and term low birth weight (tLBW) were determined, adjusting for outcome rates before active mining and available covariates.

resultsThe percent of land actively mined within a 5 km buffer of residence (or ZCTA) was negatively associated with birth weight (5 km: β = -14.07 g; 95% confidence interval [CI] = -19.35, -8.79,

conclusionsMaternal residency near active surface mining during gestation may increase risk of PTB and LBW.

Indexed as

AppalachiaBirth outcomesBirthweightCoalLow birth weightPreterm birthSurface mining

Identifiers

PMID33778360
PMCPMC7939414

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.