ReviewEnvironmental epidemiology (Philadelphia, Pa.)2019
Long-term impacts of prenatal and infant exposure to fine particulate matter on wheezing and asthma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review in Environmental epidemiology (Philadelphia, Pa.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prenatal Exposure to Air Pollutants Associated with Allergic Diseases in Children: Which Pollutant, When Exposure, and What Disease? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2024Pooled it
- Article
- The Airport, Air Quality and Asthma (AAA) Indoor Air Intervention Trial for Children with Asthma: Protocol for a Community Based Study in South King County, Washington State.Research square · 2025Article
- Association between maternal occupational exposure to cleaning chemicals during pregnancy and childhood wheeze and asthma.Frontiers in epidemiology · 2023Article
- Maternal exposure to urinary polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) in pregnancy and childhood asthma in a pooled multi-cohort study.Environment international · 2022Article
- Intervention of Particulate Matter: What Can We Do for Asthmatic Patients?Allergy, asthma & immunology research · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This systematic review aimed to summarize epidemiologic evidence regarding long-term effects of prenatal and infant particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter less than 2.5 µm (PM
methodsEpidemiologic data investigating the associations between ambient PM
resultsNine of 18 eligible studies were suitable for meta-analyses. For prenatal PM
conclusionsThe limited and inconsistent evidence is suggestive of an association between early life PM
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.