ReviewJBMR plus2021
Guidelines for Micro-Computed Tomography Analysis of Rodent Dentoalveolar Tissues.
Review in JBMR plus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
38 citing papers in PubMed.
- Unconventional auricular reconstruction using controlled scaffold buckling and chondrogenic cocktail containing muscle-derived cells.Bioactive materials · 2026Article
- IL-17 Receptor inhibition with brodalumab limits experimental periodontitis.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Article
- Methodological Evaluation of Micro-CT Analytical Parameters for Quantifying Bone Loss in a Murine Maxillary Peri-Implantitis Model.Dentistry journal · 2026Article
- Impact of oral phosphate supplements and active vitamin D treatment on dentoalveolar features of X-linked hypophosphatemia.JBMR plus · 2026Article
- Protocol for establishing a mouse model of bilateral maxillary first molar extraction to study alveolar bone healing.STAR protocols · 2026Article
- Targeted Alkaline Phosphatase Therapy Enhances Alveolar Bone Healing in X-Linked Hypophosphatemia in Mice.Journal of periodontal research · 2026Article
- Quantification of Total Porosity from CT Images by Segmenting Unhydrated Cement: A Model-Informed Framework Integrating POWERS' Volume Model.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Proof-of-principle for enhanced dentoalveolar mineralization using exogenous tissue-nonspecific alkaline phosphatase in theJBMR plus · 2025Article
- Genetic reduction or deletion of osteopontin in osteomalacicJBMR plus · 2025Article
- In Vivo Comparison of Resin-Modified and Pure Calcium-Silicate Cements for Direct Pulp Capping.Applied sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Article
- Partial cementocyte ablation does not reduce cellular cementum apposition in a mouse model of molar super-eruption.Bone reports · 2025Article
- Comparative Evaluation of Three Calcium Silicate-Based Materials for Direct Pulp Capping: AnbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Guidance on the assessment of the functionality of biomaterials for periodontal tissue regeneration: Methodologies and testing procedures.Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials · 2025Review
- Exogenous bone sialoprotein improves extraction socket healing in Ibsp knockout and wild-type mice.Bone · 2025Article
- Ligature-induced periodontitis in a transgenic mouse model of Alzheimer's disease dysregulates neuroinflammation, exacerbates cognitive impairment, and accelerates amyloid pathology.Brain, behavior, & immunity - health · 2025Article
- Disparate effects of sclerostin deletion on alveolar bone and cellular cementum in mice.Journal of periodontology · 2025Article
- Inositol-requiring enzyme 1 alpha is essential for dentinogenesis.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Article
- ADAM10 Expression by Ameloblasts Is Essential for Proper Enamel Formation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- 3D X-ray microscope acts as an accurate and effective equipment of pathological diagnosis in craniofacial imaging.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Micro-computed tomography (μCT) has become essential for analysis of mineralized as well as nonmineralized tissues and is therefore widely applicable in the life sciences. However, lack of standardized approaches and protocols for scanning, analyzing, and reporting data often makes it difficult to understand exactly how analyses were performed, how to interpret results, and if findings can be broadly compared with other models and studies. This problem is compounded in analysis of the dentoalveolar complex by the presence of four distinct mineralized tissues: enamel, dentin, cementum, and alveolar bone. Furthermore, these hard tissues interface with adjacent soft tissues, the dental pulp and periodontal ligament (PDL), making for a complex organ. Drawing on others' and our own experience analyzing rodent dentoalveolar tissues by μCT, we introduce techniques to successfully analyze dentoalveolar tissues with similar or disparate compositions, densities, and morphological characteristics. Our goal is to provide practical guidelines for μCT analysis of rodent dentoalveolar tissues, including approaches to optimize scan parameters (filters, voltage, voxel size, and integration time), reproducibly orient samples, define regions and volumes of interest, segment and subdivide tissues, interpret findings, and report methods and results. We include illustrative examples of analyses performed on genetically engineered mouse models with phenotypes in enamel, dentin, cementum, and alveolar bone. The recommendations are designed to increase transparency and reproducibility, promote best practices, and provide a basic framework to apply μCT analysis to the dentoalveolar complex that can also be extrapolated to a variety of other tissues of the body. © 2021 The Authors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.