Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33778237›Full record

ReviewACS omega2021

Understanding Slow and Heterogeneous Dynamics in Model Supercooled Glass-Forming Liquids.

Indrajit Tah, Anoop Mutneja, Smarajit Karmakar

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ACS omega, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Indrajit TahDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Pennsylvania, 209 South 33rd Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States.
Anoop MutnejaTata Institute of Fundamental Research, 36/P, Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, Hyderabad 500107, India.
Smarajit KarmakarTata Institute of Fundamental Research, 36/P, Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, Hyderabad 500107, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glasses are ubiquitous in nature. Many common items such as ketchups, cosmetic products, toothpaste, etc. and metallic glasses are examples of such glassy materials whose dynamical and rheological properties matter in our daily life. The dynamics of these glass-forming systems are known to be very sluggish and heterogeneous, but a detailed understanding of the origin of such slowing down is still lacking. Slow heterogeneous dynamics occur in a wide variety of systems at scales ranging from microscopic to macroscopic. Polymeric liquids, granular material, such as powder and sand, gels, and foams and also metallic alloys show such complex glassy dynamics at appropriate conditions. Recently, the existence of dynamical heterogeneity has also been found in biological systems starting from collective cell migration in a monolayer of cells to embryonic morphogenesis, cancer invasion, and wound healing. Extensive research in the past decade or so lead to the understanding that there are growing dynamic and static correlation lengths associated with the observed dynamical heterogeneity and rapid rise in viscosity. In this review, we have highlighted the recent developments on measuring these correlation lengths in glass-forming liquids and their possible implications in the physics of the glass transition.

Identifiers

PMID33778237
PMCPMC7992088

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.