ArticleThe archives of bone and joint surgery2021
Accuracy and Quality of Educational Videos for Elbow Physical Examination: A Search from the Earliest Year until October 2018.
Article in The archives of bone and joint surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Can educational video resources improve learning when used to augment traditional teaching of clinical examination? A randomized control trial of novice medical students.BMC medical education · 2023Trial
- Educational value assessment of YouTube surgical videos of tension-free vaginal tape obturator (TVT-O) and trans-obturator vaginal tape (TOT).Translational andrology and urology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMedical students and residents rely increasingly on web-based education. Online videos provide unique opportunities to share knowledge. The objective of this study was to investigate the accuracy and quality of instructional videos on the physical examination of the elbow and identify factors influencing educational usefulness.
methodsOn October 7, 2018, a search on YouTube, VuMedi, Orthobullets, and G9MD was performed. Videos were rated for accuracy and quality by two independent authors using a modified version of a validated scoring system for the nervous and cardiopulmonary system. Inter-rater reliability was analysed.
resultsThe 126 included videos were uploaded between June 2007 and February 2018. Twenty-three videos were indicated as useful for educational purposes. Accuracy, quality and overall scores were significantly higher for videos from specialized platforms (VuMedi, Orthobullets, G6MD) compared to YouTube. Video accuracy and quality varied widely and were not correlated. Number of days online, views, and likes showed no or weak correlation with accuracy and quality. For the overall score, our assessment tool showed excellent inter-rater reliability.
conclusionThere is considerable variation in accuracy and quality of currently available online videos on the physical examination of the elbow. We identified 23 educationally useful videos and provided an assessment method for the quality of educational videos. In educational settings, this method may help students to assess video reliability and aid educators in the development of high-quality instructional online content.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.