ArticleFrontiers in oncology2021
Defining the Optimal Method for Measuring Metabolic Tumor Volume on Preoperative
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Feasibility of different lymph node metastases delineation approaches in [EJNMMI reports · 2025Article
- Article
- Are MTV and TLG Accurate for Quantifying the Intensity of Brown Adipose Tissue Activation?Biomedicines · 2024Article
- Prognostic value of thoracic tumor staging and volume parameters in non-small cell lung cancer patients with synchronous solitary bone metastasis.Journal of thoracic disease · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesMetabolic tumor volume (MTV) on
methodsSeventy-three patients with resected PDAC who underwent
resultsIn receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, MTV by the fixed-absolute threshold method based on a threshold value of 3.5 (MTV3.5) performed best in our study with area under the curve 0.724, sensitivity of 65%, and specificity of 75%. In univariate and multivariate analyses, MTV3.5 was significantly associated with disease-specific and recurrence-free survival.
conclusionsMTV3.5 by absolute threshold on pre-treatment FDG-PET/CT was the best independent prognostic predictor in resectable PDAC compared with other absolute threshold values and relative threshold values.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.