Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33777743›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in oncology2021

The Prognostic Value of Plasma Cell-Free DNA Concentration in the Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Hongtao Liu, Yuzhen Gao, Somayeh Vafaei, Xiao Gu, Xiaoli Zhong

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Association between thyroid disorders and extra-thyroidal cancers, a review.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Liquid biopsy to personalize treatment for metastatic prostate cancer.American journal of translational research · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Using cfDNA and ctDNA as Oncologic Markers: A Path to Clinical Validation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  17. Review
  18. The stimulator of interferon genes (STING) agonists for treating acute myeloid leukemia (AML): current knowledge and future outlook.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2023
    Review
  19. The multifaced role and therapeutic regulation of autophagy in ovarian cancer.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2023
    Review
  20. CRISPR-Cas9-mediated gene therapy in lung cancer.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Hongtao LiuDepartment of Graduate School, Dalian Medical University, Dalian City, China.
Yuzhen GaoDepartment of Molecular Diagnosis, Northern Jiangsu Hospital, Yangzhou University Clinical College, Yangzhou, China.
Somayeh VafaeiDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Advanced Technologies in Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Xiao GuDepartment of Urology, Northern Jiangsu Hospital, Yangzhou University Clinical College, Yangzhou, China.
Xiaoli ZhongDepartment of Molecular Diagnosis, Northern Jiangsu Hospital, Yangzhou University Clinical College, Yangzhou, China.
Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital · CNIran University of Medical Sciences · IRYangzhou University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveBy virtue of largely disparate clinical outcomes of prostate cancer (PCA), there is a pressing need to search for useful biomarkers for PCA prognosis. Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) is a promising biomarker for detecting, monitoring, and predicting survival of prostate cancer (PCA). However, the utility of total cfDNA quantitation in PCA in clinical setting remains elusive. Here, we performed a thorough meta-analysis to assess the prognostic value of cfDNA concentration for patients with PCA. In addition, we tested the possibility of the combination of PSA and cfDNA test results to improve the prediction power in PCA prognosis. METHOD AND MATERIALS: More than six databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, Medline, PMC, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library were searched. Results yielded all eligible articles from the date of inception to June 30, 2020. Continuous, diagnostic, and prognostic variables in cfDNA in PCA were included in the meta-analysis by STATA.

resultsA total of 23 articles were enrolled in our meta-analysis: 69.6% (16/23) were related to diagnosis, and 56.5% (13/23) were related to prognosis. The pooled concentration of cfDNA in PCA patients was significantly higher than in the control group (SMD = 0.89, 95%CI = 0.53, 1.26), mirroring results for the prostate-specific antigen (PSA). For the detection test variables, the SROC with 95%CI was 0.87 (0.84-0.90) for cfDNA concentration. In terms of prognostic variables, the concentrations of cfDNA were significantly related with progression-free survival (PFS, logHR = 0.84 (95%CI0.39, 1.28) and overall survival [OS, log HR = 0.60 (95%CI0.29, 0.90)]. Lastly, the test showed no significant publication bias in the present meta-analysis, excluding the diagnostic meta-analysis.

conclusionsThe concentration of cell-free DNA is high in the prostate cancer patients. The present study substantiates the prognostic value of the cfDNA concentration. High concentration cfDNA correlates with poor disease outcome of CRPC. The study cohort with large sample size is needed to evaluate the prognosis value of cfDNA in the future. We also emphasized that combination of PSA and cf DNA quantitation is important in future large individual meta study.

Indexed as

cell-free DNAdiagnosismeta-analysisprognosisprostate cancer

Identifiers

PMID33777743
PMCPMC7991303
OpenAlexW3134031753

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.