ArticlePreventive medicine reports2021
Differences between men and women in the use of preventive medications following a major cardiovascular event: Australian prospective cohort study.
Article in Preventive medicine reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Methods and validity indicators for measuring adherence to statins in secondary cardiovascular prevention: a systematic review.Systematic reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Prevalence of Cardioprotective Medication Use in Coronary Heart Disease Patients in South America: Systematic review and Meta-Analysis.Global heart · 2022Pooled it
- Sex differences in risk factor control and medication adherence post-ACS: insights from the TEXTMEDS randomised clinical trial.Open heart · 2026Trial
- Improved adherence to statin treatment and differences in results between men and women after pictorial risk communication-a sub-study of the VIPVIZA RCT.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2024Trial
- Lipid Lowering Therapy Utilization and Lipid Goal Attainment in Women.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2025Review
- Identifying Dimensions and Items for a Questionnaire to Assess Medication Adherence in Men and Women with Ischemic Heart Disease: Insights from the GENADHECAR Study.Patient preference and adherence · 2025Article
- Age and Sex Disparities in Cardiovascular Risk Factor Management prior to Stroke: Linked Registry and General Practice Data.Neuroepidemiology · 2024Article
- Non-Persistence with Medication as a Mediator for the Social Inequality in Risk of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Patients with Incident Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Nationwide Cohort Study.Clinical epidemiology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Most cardiovascular disease (CVD) events can be prevented with appropriate risk management. Existing evidence suggests women are less likely than men to receive guideline-recommended medications, however data on sex-differences in preventive medication use following a CVD event are lacking. Relative risks (RRs) comparing use of blood pressure- and lipid-lowering medications in men and women at 3-, 6-, 9- and 12-months following hospitalisation for myocardial infarction (MI) or stroke from 2012 to 2017 were quantified using linked data from 8,278 participants enrolled in the Australian 45 and Up Study. Overall, 51% of women and 58% of men were using both blood-pressure- and lipid-lowering medications three months after a MI or stroke event, decreasing to 48% and 53%, respectively, at 12 months after an event. Adjusting for potential confounders, women were 9% less likely than men (RR = 0.91 [95% CI: 0.87, 0.95]) to be using both medications and 19% more likely (RR = 1.19 [95% CI: 1.07, 1.32]) to use neither medication three months after a MI or stroke event. At the 12-month mark, women were 8% less likely (RR = 0.92 [95% CI: 0.88, 0.97]) to be using both medications and 14% more likely (RR = 1.14 [95% CI: 1.03, 1.26]) to use neither medication. Women were consistently less likely to use both preventive medications and more likely to use neither medication at each follow-up time point. Overall, there were major shortfalls in basic preventive medication use post-CVD event and sex disparities are likely to further jeopardise efforts to reduce CVD events in the community.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.