ArticleClinical practice in pediatric psychology2020
Parent experience with volunteers and support groups in a multidisciplinary DSD clinic.
Article in Clinical practice in pediatric psychology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multi-Stakeholder Opinion Statement on the Care of Individuals Born with Differences of Sex Development: Common Ground and Opportunities for Improvement.Hormone research in paediatrics · 2025Article
- Structured care after a DSD diagnosis in childhood: a mixed methods evaluation of the Empower-DSD program.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Article
- Whose responsibility is it to talk with children and young people about intersex/differences in sex development? Young people's, caregivers' and health professionals' perspectives.Frontiers in urology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveDespite recommendations that clinics for children with a difference of sex development (DSD) should include peer support, information on how to provide this support is lacking. We utilized a mixed-methods program evaluation to evaluate family satisfaction with our clinic-based volunteers (who either have DSD themselves or are a parent of a child with DSD) and to understand the experience of these volunteers.
methodsParents (n=29) of a child with DSD completed an electronic survey. Interviews were conducted with three clinic volunteers.
resultsMost participants (72%) met with a clinic volunteer and majority (81%) rated their interaction as helpful. Most common topics discussed between parents and volunteers included: connecting to support groups (81%), their child's future (62%), and learning about their child's diagnosis (48%). Half of parents (48%) attended an after-clinic support group lunch, and 43% of these attendees rated the lunch session as helpful. Parents who attended a lunch liked the experience because they met other families with a child with a similar medical condition (100%), met volunteers with a similar medical condition (64%), and it helped them think more positively about their child's future (64%). Those who did not attend a lunch cited logistical reasons for not attending.
conclusionsIncorporating clinic volunteers into a multidisciplinary DSD clinic is associated with high reported rates of satisfaction by families and volunteers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.