Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33777583›Full record

ArticleCureus2021

Trends in Inhaler Prescriptions and Associated Cost in the United States From 2014 to 2018: An Analysis From the Medicare Part D Database.

Akesh Thomas, Ibrahim Haddad, Girendra Hoskere

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Akesh ThomasInternal Medicine, East Tennessee State University Quillen College of Medicine, Johnson City, USA.
Ibrahim HaddadInternal Medicine, East Tennessee State University Quillen College of Medicine, Johnson City, USA.
Girendra HoskerePulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, East Tennessee State University Quillen College of Medicine, Johnson City, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionChronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma constitute the majority of the pulmonary disease burden in the United States. Various kinds of inhalers are used for treating both these conditions, and Medicare is the biggest payer for them. We analyze the trend in prescriptions and associated expenses of various inhaler prescriptions from 2014 to 2018 using the Medicare part D database.

methodsMedicare part D data is analyzed for the years 2014-2018. Inhalers are grouped based on their drug class. The number of beneficiaries and the associated expenses for each inhaler and the groups were calculated separately and analyzed using statistical software. RESULTS AND

conclusionSome 85 million beneficiaries received inhalers through Medicare part D over the four years. Medicare spent 50.5 billion US dollars on these prescriptions, which showed an increase of 130% users and 128% expenditure over the four years. Medicare's expense for inhaler prescriptions is growing and is expected to increase even more in the near future.

Indexed as

asthmacopdhealth care expensesinhaler usemedicare part d

Identifiers

PMID33777583
PMCPMC7990615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.