ReviewSultan Qaboos University medical journal2021
Complications and Management of Totally Implantable Central Venous Access Ports in Cancer Patients at a University Hospital in Oman.
Review in Sultan Qaboos University medical journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Interventions to manage occluded central venous access devices: An umbrella review.The journal of vascular access · 2025Pooled it
- Is it feasible to prolong the flushing interval for totally implantable venous access devices (TIVADs)? A systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of clinical oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Intrapulmonary intra-arterial malposition of a port catheter-an exceptionally rare complication.Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946) · 2026Article
- Impact of an Educational Intervention on Nurses' Knowledge of Port Catheter Management: A Quasi-Experimental Pre-Post Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Article
- Complications of Port-a-Cath Systems: An Institutional Study on Romanian Oncological Patients.Cancers · 2026Article
- Research progress and narrative review of totally implantable venous access ports.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- A novel Artificial Intelligence Model for Predicting Totally Implantable Venous Access Device (TIVAD)-Related Infections.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2025Article
- Predictors of Complications in Patients Undergoing Port Catheter Application: A Comparative Study.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2025Observational
- A Monocentric Analysis of Implantable Ports in Cancer Treatment: Five-Year Efficacy and Safety Evaluation.Cancers · 2024Article
- Exploring factors associated with failure of totally implanted vascular access devices in a regional and rural health service: a retrospective case-control study.BMJ open quality · 2024Article
- Central venous access device terminologies, complications, and reason for removal in oncology: a scoping review.BMC cancer · 2024Article
- [Surgical complications of totally implantable venous access port in children with malignant tumors].Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTotally implantable central venous access ports (port-a-caths) are increasingly used for the safe administration of chemotherapy; however, their use is associated with complications. This study reviews patterns of complications, reasons for premature removal and the duration of the use of port-a-caths in patients receiving cancer treatment at Sultan Qaboos University Hospital (SQUH) and compares the infection rate with the literature and the researchers' experiences.
methodsThis retrospective follow-up study included patients who had received cancer treatment through a port-a-cath and were admitted to SQUH between January 2007 and April 2019. Demographic features, underlying diagnosis, clinical stage, treatment, duration of use and the cause of premature removal of the port-a-cath were recorded.
resultsA total of 516 port-a-caths were inserted in 482 cancer patients. The majority of devices were implanted by interventional radiologists (n = 459; 89.0%) and the right internal jugular vein was most frequently accessed (n = 396; 76.7%). The mean indwelling time of a port-a-cath was 288 days (range: 3-1,872 days) for patients with complications and 550 days (range: 7-3,123 days) for patients without complications. Port-a-cath-related infection was the main complication (n = 63; 12.2%). Patient age, gender, treatment intent, underlying diagnosis, clinical stage, chemotherapy regimen, number of treatment courses, operator implanting the port, the type of micro-organism isolated from the port-a-cath and body mass index were significant factors affecting catheter indwelling time (
conclusionInfection was the most common complication necessitating port-a-cath removal. The infection rate was much lower than the researchers' previous experience and compares favorably with several published reports.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.