Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33777368›Full record

ArticleClinical kidney journal2021

Renal amyloidosis: validation of a proposed histological scoring system in an independent cohort.

Joris J Hoelbeek, Jesper Kers, Eric J Steenbergen, Joris J T H Roelofs, Sandrine Florquin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical kidney journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Joris J HoelbeekDepartment of Pathology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1445-4030
Jesper KersDepartment of Pathology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Eric J SteenbergenDepartment of Pathology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Joris J T H RoelofsDepartment of Pathology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Sandrine FlorquinDepartment of Pathology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Amsterdam University Medical Centers · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn systemic amyloidosis, the kidney is frequently affected and renal involvement has a major impact on survival. Renal involvement is clinically characterized by decreased estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and proteinuria. The two most common renal amyloidosis types are light chain-related amyloidosis (AL) and serum amyloid A (AA) amyloidosis. Standardized histopathological scoring of amyloid deposits is crucial to assess disease progression. Therefore, we aimed to validate the proposed scoring system from Rubinstein

methodsWe attempt to reproduce the scoring system, consisting of an amyloid score (AS) and a composite scarring injury score (CSIS), in a multicentre AL and AA case series. Additionally, we analysed all renal amyloidosis kidney biopsies performed in the Netherlands between 1993 and 2012.

resultsSimilar to the original study, AS and CSIS correlated to eGFR (

conclusionsIn our AL case series and the original study, AS and CSIS were correlated to eGFR but not to proteinuria, and AS correlated with renal outcome. Overall, we regard this scoring system as competent for standardized histopathological assessment of amyloid deposits burden and thereby disease advancement in renal biopsies.

Indexed as

amyloidosishistological grading systemnation-wide incidencerenal biopsyvalidation

Identifiers

PMID33777368
PMCPMC7986350
OpenAlexW3013966749

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.