ArticlePrzeglad gastroenterologiczny2020
Usefulness of the hydrogen breath test in patients with functional dyspepsia.
Article in Przeglad gastroenterologiczny, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Delayed orocecal transit in pediatric gut-brain interaction disorders: A comparative study using the lactulose breath test.World journal of gastrointestinal pathophysiology · 2025Article
- Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe pathogenesis of functional dyspepsia is complex and not well understood. Therefore, in this disease there should be considered involvement of different pathogenic factors, including intestinal bacteria.
aimTo evaluate the results of the hydrogen breath test in relation to the clinical picture of functional dyspepsia. MATERIAL AND
methodsThe study included 40 healthy subjects (group I), 72 patients with postprandial distress syndrome (PDS, group II), and 84 patients with epigastric pain syndrome (EPS, group III). The diagnosis of functional dyspepsia was based on Rome Criteria IV. The urea breath test (13C-UBT) and lactulose hydrogen breath test (LHBT) were performed in all subjects. Patients with a positive urea breath test were excluded from the study. Patients with a positive LHBT test were assigned to antibiotic therapy (1200 mg daily for 14 days). Before treatment and 6 weeks after the end of antibiotic therapy the LHBT was performed, and severity of dyspeptic symptoms was assessed using a 10-points visual analogue scale.
resultsA positive LHBT test was found in 35 (48.6%) patients in the group with PDS, and in 40 (47.6%) patients with EPS (
conclusionsQuantitative and/or qualitative changes in the gut microbiota may be the cause of functional dyspepsia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.