Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33777135›Full record

Trial reportNeural plasticity2021

Weakened Effective Connectivity Related to Electroacupuncture in Stroke Patients with Prolonged Flaccid Paralysis: An EEG Pilot Study.

Yi-Fang Lin, Xin-Hua Liu, Zheng-Yu Cui, Zuo-Ting Song, Fei Zou, Shu-Geng Chen, Xiao-Yang Kang, Bin Ye, Qiang Wang, Jing Tian and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Neural plasticity, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Electroacupuncture Alters BCI-Based Brain Network in Stroke Patients.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yi-Fang LinDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7152-9583
Xin-Hua LiuDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7797-6699
Zheng-Yu CuiDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1041-5352
Zuo-Ting SongEngineering Research Center of AI & Robotics, Ministry of Education, Shanghai Engineering Research Center of AI & Robotics, MOE Frontiers Center for Brain Science, Institute of AI and Robotics, Academy for Engineering & Technology, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Fei ZouDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0129-1498
Shu-Geng ChenDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1886-9233
Xiao-Yang KangEngineering Research Center of AI & Robotics, Ministry of Education, Shanghai Engineering Research Center of AI & Robotics, MOE Frontiers Center for Brain Science, Institute of AI and Robotics, Academy for Engineering & Technology, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4372-9531
Bin YeDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, The Shanghai Third Rehabilitation Hospital, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6728-9310
Qiang WangDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Shanghai Jing'an District Central Hospital, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4234-7478
Jing TianDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9817-2999
Jie JiaDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4516-4629
Fudan University · CNJingzhou Central Hospital · CNShanghai Third People's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Flaccid paralysis in the upper extremity is a severe motor impairment after stroke, which exists for weeks, months, or even years. Electroacupuncture treatment is one of the most widely used TCM therapeutic interventions for poststroke flaccid paralysis. However, the response to electroacupuncture in different durations of flaccid stage poststroke as well as in the topological configuration of the cortical network remains unclear. The objectives of this study are to explore the disruption of the cortical network in patients in different durations of flaccid stage and observe dynamic network reorganization during and after electroacupuncture. Resting-state networks were constructed from 18 subjects with flaccid upper extremity by partial directed coherence (PDC) analysis of multichannel EEG. They were allocated to three groups according to time after flaccid paralysis: the short-duration group (those with flaccidity for less than two months), the medium-duration group (those with flaccidity between two months and six months), and the long-duration group (those with flaccidity over six months). Compared with short-duration flaccid subjects, weakened effective connectivity was presented in medium-duration and long-duration groups before electroacupuncture. The long-duration group has no response in the cortical network during electroacupuncture. The global network measures of EEG data (sPDC, mPDC, and

Indexed as

AdultAgedBeta RhythmCross-Sectional StudiesElectroacupunctureElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedParalysisPilot ProjectsStroke

Identifiers

PMID33777135
PMCPMC7969113
OpenAlexW3134483069

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.