Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33777119›Full record

ArticleJournal of otology2021

Development of video otoscopy quiz using a smartphone adaptable otoscope.

Garrett Ni, Stuart Curtis, Adam Kaplon, Neil Gildener-Leapman, Jacob Brodsky, Ksenia Aaron, Jason Mouzakes

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of otology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A deep learning approach to the diagnosis of atelectasis and attic retraction pocket in otitis media with effusion using otoscopic images.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2023
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Garrett NiDepartment of Otolaryngology, Temple University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Stuart CurtisDepartment of Otolaryngology, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Adam KaplonDepartment of Otolaryngology, Temple University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Neil Gildener-LeapmanDepartment of Otolaryngology, Albany Medical Center, Albany, NY, USA.
Jacob BrodskyDepartment of Otolaryngology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Ksenia AaronDepartment of Otolaryngology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA, USA.
Jason MouzakesDepartment of Otolaryngology, Albany Medical Center, Albany, NY, USA.
Albany Medical Center Hospital · USTemple University Hospital · USBoston Children's Hospital · USStanford Medicine · USUniversity of Michigan · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOtoscopy examination can be challenging. Traditional teaching uses still image illustrations. Newer attempts use video samples to simulate the otoscopy exam which is a dynamic process.Aims/Objective: To assess whether recorded otoscopy videos from a smartphone adaptable otoscope can be used to develop a video-based otoscopy quiz which may be used for instructing and familiarizing participants to normal anatomy and pathologic ear conditions. To use this quiz to assess current pediatric residents' competency of common otoscopy diagnosis. METHOD AND MATERIALS: This study was conducted in 2018. Video samples of ear pathology were collected at the Albany Medical Center using a smartphone adaptable otoscope- Cellscope. The videos were used to create a video otoscopy quiz (VOQ) without clinical vignettes. 45 pediatric residents from 3 academic institutions were evaluated with the quiz.

resultsThe weighted mean for the VOQ was 66.90% (95%CI 58.89%-68.42%). The breakdown by questions are: myringosclerosis 72.88%, retraction pocket 80.65%, cholesteatoma 42.22%, hemotympanum 75.04%, tympanic membrane perforation 79.62%, cerumen impaction 95.46%, otitis externa 52.54%, otitis media with effusion 63.30%, acute otitis media 75.55%, normal ear 36.39%.

conclusionWe found that videos of otoscopy exams can be obtained with a smartphone adaptable otoscope and validated to develop a video-based quiz, which may be used to supplement otoscopic instruction. Following our testing process, we found pediatric residents are relatively well equipped to identify ear pathology on VOQ.

Indexed as

Education moduleOtoscopyPediatric otolaryngologySimulation

Identifiers

PMID33777119
PMCPMC7984991
OpenAlexW3049414593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.