Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33777116›Full record

ArticleJournal of otology2021

Bell's palsy workup: Does audiometry add value?

Jing Yuan, Shirish Johari, Aruni Seneviratna, Yaw Khian Chong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of otology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jing YuanDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore.
Shirish JohariDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore.
Aruni SeneviratnaClinical Research & Innovation Office, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore.
Yaw Khian ChongDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate if routine audiometry in Bell's palsy patients has prognostic value.

methodsRetrospective case review was conducted on all Bell's palsy patients (n=191) seen at the tertiary otolaryngology specialist outpatient clinic from 2015 to 2017. Correlation of ipsilesional audiometric thresholds with patients' time-to-recovery and initial clinical severity (measured by House-Brackmann (HB) scoring) were used for the prognostic outcome measure. Audiometry results were analyzed using three contiguous frequency pure-tone average (1kHz, 2kHz, 4kHz). Statistical analysis was done via Stata (v13.1), significance tests were 2-sided at 5% significance level.

resultsThere was no significant difference between audiometric thresholds between the ipsilesional ear and the contralateral ear (p=0.87). Time-to-recovery was significantly longer for patients with severe initial presentation as compared to mild and moderate severity (p<0.01). There was no correlation found between the audiometry results and HB score at presentation (p=0.39). There was no correlation found between ipsilesional audiometric thresholds and time-to-recovery (p=0.58).

conclusionOur study suggests that routine audiometry has limited prognostic value in Bell's palsy patients.

Indexed as

AudiologyAudiometryAuditBell’s palsyFacial nerveOutcomesPrognostic

Identifiers

PMID33777116
PMCPMC7985008

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.