Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33776971›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2021

Evaluation of

Xingwen Wu, Hao Luo, Feng Xu, Chongtao Ge, Shaoting Li, Xiangyu Deng, Martin Wiedmann, Robert C Baker, Abigail Stevenson, Guangtao Zhang and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Subtyping Evaluation ofApplied and environmental microbiology · 2022
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Evaluation of multiplex nanopore sequencing forFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Xingwen WuMars Global Food Safety Center, Beijing, China.
Hao LuoMars Global Food Safety Center, Beijing, China.
Feng XuMars Global Food Safety Center, Beijing, China.
Chongtao GeMars Global Food Safety Center, Beijing, China.
Shaoting LiCenter for Food Safety, University of Georgia, Griffin, GA, United States.
Xiangyu DengCenter for Food Safety, University of Georgia, Griffin, GA, United States.
Martin WiedmannDepartment of Food Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, United States.
Robert C BakerMars Global Food Safety Center, Beijing, China.
Abigail StevensonMars Global Food Safety Center, Beijing, China.
Guangtao ZhangMars Global Food Safety Center, Beijing, China.
Silin TangMars Global Food Safety Center, Beijing, China.
Deleted InstitutionUniversity of Georgia · USCornell University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of whole genome sequencing (WGS) data generated by the long-read sequencing platform Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) has been shown to provide reliable results for

Indexed as

foodborne pathogensfood industrymultiplexOxford Nanopore TechnologiesSalmonellaserotypingsubtypingwhole genome sequencing

Identifiers

PMID33776971
PMCPMC7987803
OpenAlexW3134493510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.