ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2021
The Impact of Down-Regulation on Obstetrics and Perinatal Outcomes in Singleton Pregnancies After
Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: down-regulation has been widely used in IVF treatment; however, it lacks reports on the impact of down-regulation on obstetrics and perinatal outcomes. The purpose of this study was to compare the obstetrics and perinatal outcomes among different down-regulation conditions. Methods: this is a retrospective cohort study on 3578 patients achieving cumulative singleton clinical pregnancy after their first oocytes retrieval cycle. Patients were grouped according to the serum estradiol after down-regulation (E2D) into three groups: <30, 30-55, >55 pg/ml. The obstetrics and perinatal outcomes, and live-birth rate per clinical pregnancy were main outcome measures. In the subgroup analysis, patients were further divided according to the mode of transfer. ANOVA, chi-square test, multivariate logistic regression, and multivariate general linear model were performed for statistical analysis. Results: the patients with E2D <30, 30-55, >55 pg/ml had similar live-birth rates. The patients with E2D <30 pg/ml had a lower risk of hypertension disorders than those with E2D 30-55 pg/ml. No difference was found in the risks of placenta previa, placenta abruption, premature rupture of membrane, hemorrhage, gestational diabetes mellitus, or intrauterine growth restriction. The newborns in the group with E2D <30 pg/ml had a lower risk of PICU admission than those in the group with E2D >55 pg/ml. There was no difference in the risks of congenital anomalies or mortality among the three groups. No differences were found in the gestational week, percentages of preterm birth and very preterm birth, birth weight, percentages of low birth weight and very low birth weight, delivery mode, or sex of newborn. Subgroup analysis showed that E2D 30-55 pg/ml was associated with a higher risk of low birth weight in patients with one fresh transfer + frozen transfer(s). Conclusion: Down-regulation has no effect on the live-birth rate per clinical pregnancy. Patients with E2D <30 pg/ml may have advantages regarding lower risks of both maternal hypertension and newborn PICU admission. E2D 30-55 pg/ml may be associated with low birth weight in patients with relatively low quality embryos.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.