ArticleFrontiers in physiology2021
Prediction of Mortality in Hemodialysis Patients Using Moving Multivariate Distance.
Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Application of early warning signs to physiological contexts: a comparison of multivariate indices in patients on long-term hemodialysis.Frontiers in network physiology · 2024Article
- Network dynamical stability analysis reveals key "mallostatic" natural variables that erode homeostasis and drive age-related decline of health.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Life-Sustaining Treatment Decision in Palliative Care Based on Electronic Health Records Analysis.Journal of clinical nursing · 2023Review
- A complex systems approach to aging biology.Nature aging · 2022Review
- Synchrony of biomarker variability indicates a critical transition: Application to mortality prediction in hemodialysis.iScience · 2022Article
- The New Field of Network Physiology: Building the Human Physiolome.Frontiers in network physiology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is an increasingly widespread use of biomarkers in network physiology to evaluate an organism's physiological state. A recent study showed that albumin variability increases before death in chronic hemodialysis patients. We hypothesized that a multivariate statistical approach would better allow us to capture signals of impending physiological collapse/death. We proposed a Moving Multivariate Distance (MMD), based on the Mahalanobis distance, to quantify the variability of the multivariate biomarker profile as a whole from one visit to the next. Biomarker profiles from a visit were used as the reference to calculate MMD at the subsequent visit. We selected 16 biomarkers (of which 11 are measured every 2 weeks) from blood samples of 763 chronic kidney disease patients hemodialyzed at the CHUS hospital in Quebec, who visited the hospital regularly (∼every 2 weeks) to perform routine blood tests. MMD tended to increase markedly preceding death, indicating an increasing intraindividual multivariate variability presaging a critical transition. In survival analysis, the hazard ratio between the 97.5th percentile and the 2.5th percentile of MMD reached as high as 21.1 [95% CI: 14.3, 31.2], showing that higher variability indicates substantially higher mortality risk. Multivariate approaches to early warning signs of critical transitions hold substantial clinical promise to identify early signs of critical transitions, such as risk of death in hemodialysis patients; future work should also explore whether the MMD approach works in other complex systems (i.e., ecosystems, economies), and should compare it to other multivariate approaches to quantify system variability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.