Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33776782›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in physiology2021

Optimal Candidates to Do Fresh Embryo Transfer in Those Using Oral Contraceptive Pretreatment in IVF Cycles.

Yao Lu, Yichao Niu, Yuan Wang, Yaqiong He, Ying Ding, Xinyuan Lu, Bing Xu, Steven R Lindheim, Yun Sun

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Yao LuCenter for Reproductive Medicine, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Yichao NiuCenter for Reproductive Medicine, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Yuan WangCenter for Reproductive Medicine, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Yaqiong HeCenter for Reproductive Medicine, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Ying DingCenter for Reproductive Medicine, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Xinyuan LuKey Laboratory of Health Technology Assessment of Ministry of Heath, Collaborative Innovation Center of Social Risks Governance in Health, School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Bing XuCenter for Reproductive Medicine, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Steven R LindheimDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Boonshoft School of Medicine, Wright State University, Dayton, OH, United States.
Yun SunCenter for Reproductive Medicine, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Shanghai Jiao Tong University · CNFudan University · CNWright State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveConcern regarding the adverse impact of pretreatment of oral contraceptives (OC) prior to ovarian stimulation for

methodsA retrospective study was conducted at the Reproductive Center of Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai, China. 814 women aged 20-35 years undergoing their first autologous IVF cycle and fresh embryo transfer after OC pretreatment were included. Long gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist (a) or GnRH antagonist (ant) protocol was used for ovarian stimulation. Predictive factors for LBR were identified using multivariate logistic regression analysis.

resultsMultivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that using GnRH-ant protocol for ovarian stimulation was associated with significantly lower LBR (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.52-0.93), while endometrial thickness on day of hCG trigger was associated with increased LBR (OR 1.16, 95% CI 1.06-1.27). Despite comparable patients' age, duration of infertility, BMI and basal FSH between GnRH-a and GnRH-ant groups, those using GnRH-ant resulted in significantly lower LBR compared to the GnRH-a group (37.4 vs. 48.5%,

conclusionsLive birth was significantly impacted in OC pre-treated GnRH-ant cycles with an endometrial thickness of <9.5 mm on day of hCG trigger. Cryopreservation of all embryos in these cycles should be considered.

Indexed as

fresh embryo transferGnRH agonistGnRH antagonistin vitro fertilizationoral contraceptive

Identifiers

PMID33776782
PMCPMC7991902
OpenAlexW3135868839

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.