Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33776644›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2021

Neuronal-Plasticity and Reward-Propagation Improved Recurrent Spiking Neural Networks.

Shuncheng Jia, Tielin Zhang, Xiang Cheng, Hongxing Liu, Bo Xu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shuncheng JiaResearch Center for Brain-Inspired Intelligence, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CASIA), Beijing, China.
Tielin ZhangResearch Center for Brain-Inspired Intelligence, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CASIA), Beijing, China.
Xiang ChengResearch Center for Brain-Inspired Intelligence, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CASIA), Beijing, China.
Hongxing LiuResearch Center for Brain-Inspired Intelligence, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CASIA), Beijing, China.
Bo XuResearch Center for Brain-Inspired Intelligence, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CASIA), Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Different types of dynamics and plasticity principles found through natural neural networks have been well-applied on Spiking neural networks (SNNs) because of their biologically-plausible efficient and robust computations compared to their counterpart deep neural networks (DNNs). Here, we further propose a special Neuronal-plasticity and Reward-propagation improved Recurrent SNN (NRR-SNN). The historically-related adaptive threshold with two channels is highlighted as important neuronal plasticity for increasing the neuronal dynamics, and then global labels instead of errors are used as a reward for the paralleling gradient propagation. Besides, a recurrent loop with proper sparseness is designed for robust computation. Higher accuracy and stronger robust computation are achieved on two sequential datasets (i.e., TIDigits and TIMIT datasets), which to some extent, shows the power of the proposed NRR-SNN with biologically-plausible improvements.

Indexed as

neuronal plasticityreward propagationsparse connectionsspiking neural networksynaptic plasticity

Identifiers

PMID33776644
PMCPMC7994752

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.