Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33776496›Full record

ArticleRisk management and healthcare policy2021

Utilization of Routine Health Information from Health Management Information System and Associated Factors Among Health Workers at Health Centers in Oromia Special Zone, Ethiopia: A Multilevel Analysis.

Mohammed Ahmed Seid, Negalign Berhanu Bayou, Fanos Yeshanew Ayele, Aregash Abebayehu Zerga

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Risk management and healthcare policy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mohammed Ahmed SeidZone Health Office, Oromia Specialized Zone, Kemisse, Amhara Region, Ethiopia.
Negalign Berhanu BayouDepartment of Health Service Management School of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Science, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia.
Fanos Yeshanew AyeleDepartment of Nutrition, School of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Science, Wollo University, Dessie, Ethiopia.ORCID 0000-0003-0646-9742
Aregash Abebayehu ZergaDepartment of Nutrition, School of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Science, Wollo University, Dessie, Ethiopia.ORCID 0000-0002-2184-6457

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHealth management information system is a building block for the health system. Even if using health facility data at all levels is critical, it is poorly practiced in developing countries. There is limited evidence about the utilization of routine health information from the health management information system in the study area. This study aimed to assess the utilization of routine health information from health management information system and associated factors among health professionals at health centers in Oromia special zone, Amhara region, Ethiopia.

methodsA facility-based cross-sectional study was conducted from February to March 2019. A total of 369 health professionals who were the focal person for each service delivery point were taken from the selected health centers. The data analysis was done using STATA version 14. A multilevel mixed-effect logistic regression model was carried out to identify factors associated with utilization of routine health information from the health management information system. Adjusted odds ratio with 95% CI was reported to show the strength of association. A P-value of <0.05 was used to declare statistical significance.

resultsThe magnitude of good routine health information utilization among health care professionals was 52.8%. Training (AOR=2.40, 95% CI=1.35, 4.26), availability of standard indicator definition (AOR=2.01, 95% CI=1.13, 3.57), data analysis skills (AOR=2.59, 95% CI=1.45, 4.62), regular feedback (AOR=2.29, 95% CI=1.29, 4.05), performance evaluation (AOR=2.60, 95% CI=1.19, 5.68) and timely reporting (AOR=2.89, 95% CI=1.54, 5.42) were significantly associated with routine health information utilization.

conclusionThe overall utilization of routine health information from the health management information system was low. Therefore, the Zone health department and woreda health offices need to give training on HMIS data use, and avail standard indicator definition for all health care workers at all service delivery points.

Indexed as

health care professionalshealth centersroutine health information utilization

Identifiers

PMID33776496
PMCPMC7987307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.