Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33776405›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Water Resources Association2019

Efficient Delineation of Nested Depression Hierarchy in Digital Elevation Models for Hydrological Analysis Using Level-Set Methods.

Qiusheng Wu, Charles R Lane, Lei Wang, Melanie K Vanderhoof, Jay R Christensen, Hongxing Liu

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Mapping global non-floodplain wetlands.Earth system science data · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Qiusheng WuDepartment of Geography, Binghamton University, Binghamton, New York, USA.
Charles R LaneOffice of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Lei WangDepartment of Geography and Anthropology, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA.
Melanie K VanderhoofGeosciences and Environmental Change Science Center, U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, Colorado, USA.
Jay R ChristensenOffice of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA.
Hongxing LiuDepartment of Geography, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Environmental Protection Agency · USBinghamton University · USLouisiana State University · USUnited States Geological Survey · USUniversity of Cincinnati · US

Funding

Intramural EPA EPA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In terrain analysis and hydrological modeling, surface depressions (or sinks) in a digital elevation model (DEM) are commonly treated as artifacts and thus filled and removed to create a depressionless DEM. Various algorithms have been developed to identify and fill depressions in DEMs during the past decades. However, few studies have attempted to delineate and quantify the nested hierarchy of actual depressions, which can provide crucial information for characterizing surface hydrologic connectivity and simulating the fill-merge-spill hydrological process. In this paper, we present an innovative and efficient algorithm for delineating and quantifying nested depressions in DEMs using the level-set method based on graph theory. The proposed level-set method emulates water level decreasing from the spill point along the depression boundary to the lowest point at the bottom of a depression. By tracing the dynamic topological changes (i.e., depression splitting/merging) within a compound depression, the level-set method can construct topological graphs and derive geometric properties of the nested depressions. The experimental results of two fine-resolution Light Detection and Ranging-derived DEMs show that the raster-based level-set algorithm is much more efficient (~150 times faster) than the vector-based contour tree method. The proposed level-set algorithm has great potential for being applied to large-scale ecohydrological analysis and watershed modeling.

Identifiers

PMID33776405
PMCPMC7995241
OpenAlexW2888676086

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.