ArticleJournal of the American Water Resources Association2019
Efficient Delineation of Nested Depression Hierarchy in Digital Elevation Models for Hydrological Analysis Using Level-Set Methods.
Article in Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 86 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluation of the Usability of UAV LiDAR for Analysis of Karst (Doline) Terrain Morphology.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Mapping global non-floodplain wetlands.Earth system science data · 2023Article
- Topographic hydro-conditioning to resolve surface depression storage and ponding in a fully distributed hydrologic model.Advances in water resources · 2023Article
- Headwater streams and inland wetlands: Status and advancements of geospatial datasets and maps across the United States.Earth-science reviews · 2022Article
- Estimation of Infiltration Volumes and Rates in Seasonally Water-Filled Topographic Depressions Based on Remote-Sensing Time Series.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Emergent dispersal networks in dynamic wetlandscapes.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Surface Depression and Wetland Water Storage Improves Major River Basin Hydrologic Predictions.Water resources research · 2020Article
- Non-floodplain Wetlands Affect Watershed Nutrient Dynamics: A Critical Review.Environmental science & technology · 2019Review
- Integrating LiDAR data and multi-temporal aerial imagery to map wetland inundation dynamics using Google Earth Engine.Remote sensing of environment · 2019Article
- Modeling Connectivity of Non-floodplain Wetlands: Insights, Approaches, and Recommendations.Journal of the American Water Resources Association · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
In terrain analysis and hydrological modeling, surface depressions (or sinks) in a digital elevation model (DEM) are commonly treated as artifacts and thus filled and removed to create a depressionless DEM. Various algorithms have been developed to identify and fill depressions in DEMs during the past decades. However, few studies have attempted to delineate and quantify the nested hierarchy of actual depressions, which can provide crucial information for characterizing surface hydrologic connectivity and simulating the fill-merge-spill hydrological process. In this paper, we present an innovative and efficient algorithm for delineating and quantifying nested depressions in DEMs using the level-set method based on graph theory. The proposed level-set method emulates water level decreasing from the spill point along the depression boundary to the lowest point at the bottom of a depression. By tracing the dynamic topological changes (i.e., depression splitting/merging) within a compound depression, the level-set method can construct topological graphs and derive geometric properties of the nested depressions. The experimental results of two fine-resolution Light Detection and Ranging-derived DEMs show that the raster-based level-set algorithm is much more efficient (~150 times faster) than the vector-based contour tree method. The proposed level-set algorithm has great potential for being applied to large-scale ecohydrological analysis and watershed modeling.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.