Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33776367›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of gastroenterology2021

Advanced small-bowel well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumours: An international survey of practice on 3

Angela Lamarca, Mauro Cives, Louis de Mestier, Joakim Crona, Francesca Spada, Kjell Öberg, Marianne Pavel, Teresa Alonso-Gordoa

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of gastroenterology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Angela LamarcaDepartment of Medical Oncology, European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society Centre of Excellence, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, University of Manchester, Manchester M20 4BX, United Kingdom. angela.lamarca@nhs.net.
Mauro CivesDepartment of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari 70121, Italy.
Louis de MestierDepartment of Gastroenterology and Pancreatology, European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society Center of Excellence, Paris-Diderot University, Clichy 75006, France.
Joakim CronaDepartment of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala SE-751 85, Sweden.
Francesca SpadaGastrointestinal Medical Oncology and Neuroendocrine Tumors Unit, European Institute of Oncology, Milan 20141, Italy.
Kjell ÖbergDepartment of Endocrine Oncology, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala SE-751 85, Sweden.
Marianne PavelDepartment of Endocrinology, Universitatsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen 91054, Germany.
Teresa Alonso-GordoaMedical Oncology Department, The Ramón y Cajal Health Research Institute, Alcalá University, University Hospital Ramon y Cajal, Madrid 28034, Spain.
Manchester Academic Health Science Centre · GBUniversity of Bari Aldo Moro · ITUppsala University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSomatostatin analogues are an established first-line therapy for well differentiated small bowel neuroendocrine tumours (Wd-SBNETs), while and peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is frequently used as a second-line therapy. Adequate treatment selection of third-line treatment remains challenging due to the limited prospective data currently available on the best therapeutic sequence.

aimTo understand current practice and rationale for decision-making by physicians in the 3

methodsWeighted average (WA) of likelihood of usage between responders (1 very unlikely; 4 very likely) was used to reflect the relevance of factors explored.

resultsReplies from representatives of 28 centers were received (5/8/2020-21/9/2020); medical oncologist (53.6%), gastroenterologist (17.9%); United Kingdom (21.4%), Spain (17.9%), Italy (14.3%). Majority from European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (ENETS) Centres of Excellence (57.1%), who followed ENETS guidelines (82.1%). Generally speaking, 3

conclusionEverolimus was the most frequently used therapeutic option in the third-line setting. The most important factors for decision-making included Ki-67, rate of progression, functionality and tumour burden; since this decision is based on multiple factors, it highlights the need for a multidisciplinary assessment.

Indexed as

Neuroendocrine TumorsAgedHumansItalyProspective StudiesSpainUnited KingdomAdvancedNeuroendocrine tumourPracticeSmall bowelSurveyThird-line

Identifiers

PMID33776367
PMCPMC7968134
OpenAlexW3137067254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.