Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33776087›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of anaesthesia2021

Effect of hand-holding and conversation alone or with midazolam premedication on preoperative anxiety in adult patients-A randomised controlled trial.

Bhavna Sriramka, Diptimayee Mallik, Jayanti Singh, Megha Khetan

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of anaesthesia, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06742814 (Effects of Stress Ball Use for Patients Undergoing Local Anesthesia in Ambulatory Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06742814 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Effects of Stress Ball Use for Patients Undergoing Local Anesthesia in Ambulatory Surgery

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Taiwan University HospitalRan2025 to 2025Enrolled74ConditionsAnxietyArmsstress ball
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Nurse-led Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Programs: Potential Solution to Shorten Postoperative Recovery.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bhavna SriramkaDepartment of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, IMS & SUM Hospital, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Diptimayee MallikDepartment of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, IMS & SUM Hospital, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Jayanti SinghDepartment of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, IMS & SUM Hospital, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Megha KhetanDepartment of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, IMS & SUM Hospital, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Institute of Medical Sciences and Sum Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsAnxiety causing stress is most profound before surgery. Anxiolytics are used routinely to combat perioperative anxiety. Studies have shown that hand-holding and communication are useful in reducing anxiety levels intraoperatively. This study compares the effectiveness of the same with pharmacological interventions in allaying preoperative anxiety. MATERIAL AND

methodsThis is a three-arm parallel-group randomised controlled trial. A total of 90 adult patients aged <45 years and of American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade 1-2, undergoing laparoscopic surgery were enroled in this study. Patients received either intravenous (IV) midazolam (group M) or hand-holding and conversation (group HC), or a combination of IV midazolam and holding and conversation (group HCM) in the preoperative room. Anxiety, heart rate (HR) and mean blood pressure (MBP) were recorded before and 20 minutes after the intervention. Anxiety was measured using the Amsterdam preoperative anxiety and information scale. The analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) test was done to analyse the difference between the groups.

resultsThe mean anxiety scores were significantly different in the three groups (p = 0.04) after intervention, with the lowest score in group HCM, followed by group HC and the highest score in group M. The mean heart rates were also significantly different in the three groups after intervention but MBP was not significantly different in the three groups.

conclusionA combination of hand-holding and conversation and midazolam is best for allaying preoperative anxiety in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgeries than either method alone.

Indexed as

Anxietyinterviewmidazolampreoperative periodtouch

Identifiers

PMID33776087
PMCPMC7983819
OpenAlexW3128417292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.