Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33775932›Full record

ArticleBMJ supportive & palliative care2021

Community access to palliative care medicines-patient and professional experience: systematic review and narrative synthesis.

Mizue Ogi, Natasha Campling, Jakki Birtwistle, Alison Richardson, Michael I Bennett, Miriam Santer, Susan Latter

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ supportive & palliative care, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Challenges to timely access to out-of-hours end-of-life medications: a qualitative study in UK primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mizue OgiSchool of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, UK.
Natasha CamplingSchool of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, UK.
Jakki BirtwistleLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Alison RichardsonSchool of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, UK.
Michael I BennettLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, West Yorkshire, UK.
Miriam SanterSchool of Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, UK.
Susan LatterSchool of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, UK sml@soton.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0973-0512
University of Southampton · GBUniversity of Leeds · GBUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProviding palliative care patients living at home with timely access to medicines is critical to enable effective symptom management, minimise burden and reduce unplanned use of healthcare services. Little is known about how diverse community-based palliative care models influence medicine access.

objectiveTo produce a critical overview of research on experiences and outcomes of medicine access in community-based palliative care models of service delivery through a systematic review and narrative synthesis.

methodsMEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library databases and grey literature were systematically searched for all types of studies. Study quality was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool; a narrative synthesis was used to integrate and summarise findings.

results3331 articles were screened; 10 studies were included in the final sample. Studies included a focus on community pharmacy (n=4), hospice emergency medication kits (HEMKs) in the home (n=3), specialist community nurse prescribers (n=1), general practice (n=1) and one study included multiple service delivery components. Community pharmacy was characterised by access delays due to lack of availability of medicine stock and communication difficulties between the pharmacy and other healthcare professionals. HEMKs were perceived to reduce medicine access time out of hours and speed symptom control. However, the majority of studies comprised small, local samples, largely limited to self-reports of health professionals. There was a lack of data on outcomes, and no comparisons between service delivery models.

conclusionsFurther research is required to understand which models facilitate rapid and efficient access to medicines for community-based palliative care patients.

Indexed as

home careservice evaluationsymptoms and symptom management

Identifiers

PMID33775932
PMCPMC11671949
OpenAlexW3147865021

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.