Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33775741›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of infection control2021

Availability and crisis standards of care for personal protective equipment during fall 2020 of the COVID-19 pandemic: A national study by the APIC COVID-19 task force.

Terri Rebmann, Rebecca T Alvino, Jill E Holdsworth

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of infection control, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Enhancing Microwave Disinfection: Impact of Sodium Chloride on Microbial Inactivation.IEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Healthcare-associated infections in Dutch hospitals during the COVID-19 pandemic.Antimicrobial resistance and infection control · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. The impact of COVID-19 on health care-associated infections in intensive care units in low- and middle-income countries: International Nosocomial Infection Control Consortium (INICC) findings.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2022
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The interface between COVID-19 and bacterial healthcare-associated infections.Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases · 2021
    Review
  15. Occupational Infections among Dental Health Workers in Germany-14-Year Time Trends.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Terri RebmannInstitute for Biosecurity, Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Saint Louis University, College for Public Health and Social Justice, Saint Louis, MO. Electronic address: terri.rebmann@slu.edu.
Rebecca T AlvinoUCSF Health, San Francisco, CA.
Jill E HoldsworthInfection Prevention Department, Emory University Hospital Midtown, Atlanta, GA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic resulted in personal protective equipment (PPE) shortages in spring 2020, necessitating crisis protocols.

methodsAn online survey was administered to all Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology members in October, 2020 to assess PPE availability and crisis standards utilized in fall, 2020.

resultsIn total, 1,081 infection preventionists participated. A quarter lacked sufficient disinfection supplies, N95s, isolation gowns, and gloves; 10%-20% lacked eye protection and hand hygiene supplies. Significantly more were reusing respirators than masks (65.6% vs 46.8%, respectively; P < .001); a third (32.0%, n = 735) were reusing isolation gowns. About half (45.9%, n = 496) were decontaminating respirators. Determinants of believing current PPE reuse protocols were safe and evidence-based included the infection preventionists being involved in developing COVID-19 protocols (both), having respirator reuse protocols that involve ≤ 5 reuses (both), using reusable respiratory protection (both), decontaminating respirators (perceived safe), and not reusing masks (perceived safe; P < .05 for all).

conclusionsAlthough most health care facilities had adequate PPE in fall 2020, PPE supply chains were still disrupted, resulting in the need to reuse or decontaminate PPE. Ongoing gaps in PPE access need to be addressed in order to minimize health care associated infections and occupational illness.

Indexed as

COVID-19Personal Protective EquipmentHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2Standard of CarePandemicSARS-CoV-2Surge capacity

Identifiers

PMID33775741
PMCPMC7997145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.