Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33775734›Full record

ReviewBiological psychology2021

Capturing emotion coherence in daily life: Using ambulatory physiology measures and ecological momentary assessments to examine within-person associations and individual differences.

Natalia Van Doren, Chelsea N Dickens, Lizbeth Benson, Timothy R Brick, Lisa Gatzke-Kopp, Zita Oravecz

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biological psychology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Interoceptive attention and mood in daily life: an experience-sampling study.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Affect Across the Wake-Sleep Cycle.Affective science · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Natalia Van DorenDepartment of Psychology, The Pennsylvania State University, 370 Moore Building, University Park, PA, 16802, United States. Electronic address: nataliavandoren@psu.edu.
Chelsea N DickensDepartment of Human Development and Family Studies, The Pennsylvania State University, Health and Human Development Building, University Park, PA, 16802, United States. Electronic address: czd171@psu.edu.
Lizbeth BensonDepartment of Human Development and Family Studies, The Pennsylvania State University, Health and Human Development Building, University Park, PA, 16802, United States. Electronic address: leb237@psu.edu.
Timothy R BrickDepartment of Human Development and Family Studies, The Pennsylvania State University, Health and Human Development Building, University Park, PA, 16802, United States; Institute for Computational and Data Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, 224B Computer Building, University Park, PA, 16802, United States. Electronic address: tbrick@psu.edu.
Lisa Gatzke-KoppDepartment of Human Development and Family Studies, The Pennsylvania State University, Health and Human Development Building, University Park, PA, 16802, United States. Electronic address: lmk18@psu.edu.
Zita OraveczDepartment of Human Development and Family Studies, The Pennsylvania State University, Health and Human Development Building, University Park, PA, 16802, United States; Institute for Computational and Data Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, 224B Computer Building, University Park, PA, 16802, United States. Electronic address: zita@psu.edu.
Pennsylvania State University · US

Funding

PREVENTION AND METHODOLOGY TRAINING (PAMT)T32DA017629 · NIDA · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY-UNIV PARK · PI Eric D Claus, Rina D Eiden · 2005 to 2026
$9.5M
Penn State Biomedical Big Data to Knowledge (B2D2K) Training ProgramT32LM012415 · NLM · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI BROACH, JAMES R., HONAVAR, VASANT G. · 2016 to 2020
$1.2M
NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA017629NLM NIH HHS T32 LM012415
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While emotion coherence has long been theorized to be a core feature of emotion, to date, studies examining response coherence have been conducted in laboratory settings. The present study used a combined approach of ambulatory physiology measures and ecological momentary assessment conducted over a 4-week period to examine the extent to which emotional experience and physiology show coherence in daily life within-persons; and whether individual differences in response coherence are associated with between-person differences in well-being, negative emotionality, and gender. Results revealed that, on average, individuals exhibited coherence between subjective experience and physiology of emotion, but that there was substantial between-person variation in coherence in daily life. Exploratory analyses revealed no credible link between levels of response coherence and well-being, negative emotionality, or gender. Findings contribute to the literature by demonstrating a novel methodological approach to measuring coherence in daily life and supporting the generalizability of coherence to ecologically valid contexts.

Indexed as

Ecological Momentary AssessmentIndividualityEmotionsHumansInterpersonal RelationsEMAEmotion coherenceEmotion concordanceResponse coherenceWell-being

Identifiers

PMID33775734
PMCPMC9710534
OpenAlexW3144907110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.