Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33775279›Full record

ArticleAnnals of epidemiology2021

Efficacy of a student-led community contact tracing program partnered with an academic medical center during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic.

Matt Pelton, Daniela Medina, Natasha Sood, Kaleb Bogale, Lindsay Buzzelli, Joshua Blaker, Derek Nye, Paul D H Nguyen, Marisa Giglio, Catherine Smiley and 7 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of epidemiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Appraisal of a Contact Tracing Training Program for COVID-19 in Greece Focusing on Vulnerable Populations.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Matt PeltonPenn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA. Electronic address: Mpelton1@pennstatehealth.psu.edu.
Daniela MedinaPenn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA.
Natasha SoodPenn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA.
Kaleb BogalePenn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA.
Lindsay BuzzelliPenn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA.
Joshua BlakerPenn State Health Milton S Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA.
Derek NyePenn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA.
Paul D H NguyenPenn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA.
Marisa GiglioPenn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA.
Catherine SmileyPenn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA.
Nathan MichalakPenn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA.
Nicole R LegroPenn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA.
Mary ConnollyPenn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA.
Rachel A DishongPenn State College of Nursing, State College, PA.
Johnathan NunezPenn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA; Penn State Health Milton S Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA.
Ping DuPenn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA; Penn State Health Milton S Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA.
Cara ExtenPenn State College of Nursing, State College, PA.
Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center · USPennsylvania State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeContact tracing has proven successful at controlling coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) globally, and the Center for Health Security has recommended that the United States add 100,000 contact tracers to the current workforce.

methodsTo address gaps in local contact tracing, health professional students partnered with their academic institution to conduct contact tracing for all COVID-19 cases diagnosed onsite, which included identifying and reaching their contacts, educating participants, and providing social resources to support effective quarantine and isolation.

resultsFrom March 24 to May 28, 536 laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 cases were contacted and reported an average of 2.6 contacts. Contacts were informed of their exposure, asked to quarantine, and monitored for the onset of symptoms. Callers reached 94% of cases and 84% of contacts. Seventy-four percent of cases reported at least one contact. Household members had higher rates of reporting symptoms (odds ratio, 1.65; 95% confidence interval, 1.19-2.28). The average test turnaround time decreased from 21.8 days for the first patients of this program to 2.3 days on the eleventh week.

conclusionsThis provides evidence for the untapped potential of community contact tracing to respond to regional needs, confront barriers to effective quarantine, and mitigate the spread of COVID-19.

Indexed as

PandemicsStudentsAcademic Medical CentersContact TracingCOVID-19HumansQuarantineUnited StatesCommunicable diseasesCommunity health servicesContact tracingCoronavirus infectionInterdisciplinary research

Identifiers

PMID33775279
PMCPMC7579098
OpenAlexW3094266842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.