Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33774928›Full record

ArticleACR open rheumatology2021

A North American Cohort of Anti-SAE Dermatomyositis: Clinical Phenotype, Testing, and Review of Cases.

Jemima Albayda, Christopher Mecoli, Livia Casciola-Rosen, Sonye K Danoff, Cheng Ting Lin, David Hines, Laura Gutierrez-Alamillo, Julie J Paik, Eleni Tiniakou, Andrew L Mammen and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACR open rheumatology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Cancer in connective tissue disease.Frontiers in immunology · 2025
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jemima AlbaydaJohns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8030-9504
Christopher MecoliJohns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1429-8392
Livia Casciola-RosenJohns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4172-1539
Sonye K DanoffJohns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Cheng Ting LinJohns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
David HinesJohns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Laura Gutierrez-AlamilloJohns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Julie J PaikJohns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8436-1601
Eleni TiniakouJohns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4749-870X
Andrew L MammenJohns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, and National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Lisa Christopher-StineJohns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7150-7306
Johns Hopkins University · USNational Institutes of Health · US

Funding

Muscle Disease UnitZIAAR041203 · NIAMS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ARTHRITIS AND MUSCULOSKELETAL AND SKIN DISEASES · PI MAMMEN, ANDREW · 2015 to 2025
$19.7M
Sample Processing and Immunoassay Research CoreP30AR070254 · NIAMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI CLIFTON O BINGHAM, Antony Rosen · 2016 to 2026
$8.9M
Skeletal Myopathy in Systemic Sclerosis: Devising a Classification Schema Predictive of OutcomesK23AR073927 · NIAMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI PAIK, JULIE JISUN · 2020 to 2024
$787k
Optimizing the Approach to Identify Cancer-Associated MyositisK23AR075898 · NIAMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI MECOLI, CHRISTOPHER · 2019 to 2023
$773k
Cupid FoundationDonald B. and Dorothy L. Stabler FoundationHuayi and Siuling Zhang Discovery FundJerome L. Greene FoundationNIAMS NIH HHS K23 AR073927NIAMS NIH HHS K23 AR075898NIAMS NIH HHS K23AR075898NIAMS NIH HHS P30 AR070254NIAMS NIH HHS P30-AR070254
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAntibodies against the small ubiquitin-like modifier (SUMO) activating enzyme (SAE) are one of the rarer specificities associated with dermatomyositis (DM). The purpose of this study is to describe the clinical characteristics of patients with anti-SAE autoantibodies in a North American cohort and to ascertain cancer prevalence. We also describe the performance characteristics of the line blotting (Euroimmun) method for antibody detection compared with an immunoprecipitation-based assay.

methodsSera from 2127 patients suspected of having myositis were assayed for myositis-specific autoantibodies using the Euroimmun platform. Those positive for SAE autoantibodies were assayed by a second method (immunoprecipitation) for confirmation. Only those cases positive by both methods were taken as definite cases of anti-SAE-positive DM. Chart reviews of these patients were completed to obtain information on clinical characteristics, cancer history, and treatment.

resultsForty-three of 2127 sera were anti-SAE autoantibody positive by Euroimmun (≥15 units, +); of these, only 19 were confirmed positive by immunoprecipitation. All 19 cases had skin involvement and varying presentations of muscle, lung, and joint disease. Cancer occurred coincident with DM in two patients, and cancers were detected more than 5 years from symptom onset in three patients. In a population of suspected inflammatory myositis, a higher cutoff on line blot testing (≥36 units, ++) yielded better agreement with immunoprecipitation methods.

conclusionSAE autoantibodies associate with a clinical phenotype of DM, which most commonly presents with a rash first, followed by muscle involvement and varying extramuscular involvement. As coincident cancer was seen in anti-SAE-positive DM, judicious malignancy screening may be warranted.

Identifiers

PMID33774928
PMCPMC8126760
OpenAlexW3144729979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.