Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33774899›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2021

Diabetes care provided by national standards can improve patients' self-management skills: A qualitative study of how people with type 2 diabetes perceive primary diabetes care.

Rebecka Husdal, Eva Thors Adolfsson, Janeth Leksell, Lena Nordgren

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rebecka HusdalDepartment of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Family Medicine and Preventive Medicine, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-0300-4539
Eva Thors AdolfssonCentre for Clinical Research Västmanland, Uppsala University, Västerås, Sweden.
Janeth LeksellDepartment of Medical Sciences, Clinical Diabetology and Metabolism, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Lena NordgrenDepartment of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Family Medicine and Preventive Medicine, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe increasing incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus [T2DM] has resulted in extensive research into the characteristics of successful primary diabetes care. Even if self-management support and continuity are increasingly recognized as important, there is still a need for deeper understanding of how patients' experiences of continuity of care coincide with their needs for self-management and/or self-management support.

objectiveTo gain a deeper understanding of how people with T2DM perceive Swedish primary diabetes care and self-management support.

methodsThis qualitative study used focus groups as the means for data collection. Participants were identified through a purposive sampling method differing in age, sex, diabetes duration and latest registered glycated haemoglobin level. Twenty-eight participants formed five focus groups. Qualitative content analysis was applied to interview transcripts.

resultsThe main theme emerging from the focus group data was that diabetes care provided by national standards improved self-management skills. Two themes that emerged from the analysis were (a) the importance of a clarification of structures and procedures in primary diabetes care and (b) health-care staff 'being there' and providing support enables trust and co-operation to enhance self-management.

conclusionsIndividual patients' self-management resources are strengthened if the importance of providing relational continuity, management continuity and informational continuity is considered. Patients also need assistance on 'how' self-management activities should be performed. PATIENT CONTRIBUTION: Prior to the study, one pilot focus group was conducted with patients to obtain their perspectives on the content of the planned focus groups; thus, patients were involved in both planning and conduct of the study.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Self-ManagementFocus GroupsHumansPrimary Health CareQualitative Researchcontinuityprimary diabetes carequalitative studyself-managementtype 2 diabetes mellitus

Identifiers

PMID33774899
PMCPMC8235889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.