Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33774870›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie2021

Accounting for genetic architecture for body weight improves accuracy of predicting breeding values in a commercial line of broilers.

Hélène Romé, Thinh T Chu, Danye Marois, Chyong-Huoy Huang, Per Madsen, Just Jensen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Accounting for genetic architecture for body weight improves accuracy of predicting breeding values in a commercial line of broilers.Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hélène RoméCenter for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, Tjele, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0714-5961
Thinh T ChuCenter for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, Tjele, Denmark.
Danye MaroisCobb-Vantress Inc., Siloam Springs, AR, USA.
Chyong-Huoy HuangCobb-Vantress Inc., Siloam Springs, AR, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8184-6590
Per MadsenCenter for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, Tjele, Denmark.
Just JensenCenter for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, Tjele, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BLUP (best linear unbiased prediction) is the standard for predicting breeding values, where different assumptions can be made on variance-covariance structure, which may influence predictive ability. Herein, we compare accuracy of prediction of four derived-BLUP models: (a) a pedigree relationship matrix (PBLUP), (b) a genomic relationship matrix (GBLUP), (c) a weighted genomic relationship matrix (WGBLUP) and (d) a relationship matrix based on genomic features that consisted of only a subset of SNP selected on a priori information (GFBLUP). We phenotyped a commercial population of broilers for body weight (BW) in five successive weeks and genotyped them using a 50k SNP array. We compared predictive ability of univariate models using conservative cross-validation method, where each full-sib group was divided into two folds. Results from cross-validation showed, with WGBLUP model, a gain in accuracy from 2% to 7% compared with GBLUP model. Splitting the additive genetic matrix into two matrices, based on significance level of SNP (G

Indexed as

Body WeightChickensPolymorphism, Single NucleotideAnimalsGenomeGenotypeModels, GeneticPedigreePhenotype

Identifiers

PMID33774870
PMCPMC8451786

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.