Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33774762›Full record

ArticleNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2021

Virtual visits for chronic neurologic disorders during COVID-19 pandemic.

Irene Rosellini, Marika Vianello, Anna Ghazaryan, Silvia Vittoria Guidoni, Anna Palmieri, Federico Giopato, Roberta Vitaliani, Matteo Fuccaro, Alberto Terrin, Maria Teresa Rigoni and 2 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Health equity, care access and quality in headache - part 2.The journal of headache and pain · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Development and validation of the Myasthenia Gravis TeleScore (MGTS).Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2022
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Irene RoselliniUnit of Neurology, Department of Neuro-cardio-vascular, Ca' Foncello Hospital, 31100, Treviso, Italy.
Marika VianelloUnit of Neurology, Department of Neuro-cardio-vascular, Ca' Foncello Hospital, 31100, Treviso, Italy.
Anna GhazaryanUnit of Neurology, Department of Neuro-cardio-vascular, Ca' Foncello Hospital, 31100, Treviso, Italy.
Silvia Vittoria GuidoniUnit of Neurology, Department of Neuro-cardio-vascular, Ca' Foncello Hospital, 31100, Treviso, Italy.
Anna PalmieriUnit of Neurology, Department of Neuro-cardio-vascular, Ca' Foncello Hospital, 31100, Treviso, Italy.
Federico GiopatoUnit of Neurology, Department of Neuro-cardio-vascular, Ca' Foncello Hospital, 31100, Treviso, Italy.
Roberta VitalianiUnit of Neurology, Department of Neuro-cardio-vascular, Ca' Foncello Hospital, 31100, Treviso, Italy.
Matteo FuccaroUnit of Neurology, Department of Neuro-cardio-vascular, Ca' Foncello Hospital, 31100, Treviso, Italy.
Alberto TerrinUnit of Neurology, Department of Neuro-cardio-vascular, Ca' Foncello Hospital, 31100, Treviso, Italy.
Maria Teresa RigoniUnit of Neurology, Department of Neuro-cardio-vascular, Ca' Foncello Hospital, 31100, Treviso, Italy.
Francesco PietrobonSocio-health District South, AULSS 2 Treviso, Treviso, Italy.
Domenico Marco BonifatiUnit of Neurology, Department of Neuro-cardio-vascular, Ca' Foncello Hospital, 31100, Treviso, Italy. domenicomarco.bonifati@aulss2.veneto.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7204-7228
Ca' Foncello Hospital · ITAULSS 2 Marca Trevigiana · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCOVID-19 pandemic has boosted telemedicine in medical clinical practice. Experiences in the management of chronic neurological disorders are limited and scattered. The aim of the study was to evaluate feasibility and efficacy of virtual visit for chronic neurological disorders during COVID-19 pandemic.

methodsAll patients scheduled for a visit during the lockdown period were contacted. The patients fell into four categories: (1) long-term follow-up, the patient was re-scheduled; (2) visit was necessary, teleconsultation was accepted; (3) problem was solved by phone call; and (4) visit was necessary and teleconsultation was not feasible, then visit was maintained. Google Meet was used. During the virtual visit, neurological examination was performed, and demographic and clinical characteristics were recorded.

resultsAt the end of May 2020, 184 virtual visits for 178 patients were performed for the following diseases: myasthenia gravis (47 patients), multiple sclerosis (79), epilepsy (12), headache (6), and parkinsonism (34). The patients were 70 males and 108 females with a mean age of 53.5 years (range 13-90). During virtual visit, we were able to obtain a satisfactory neurological examination.

conclusionsWe demonstrated feasibility and effectiveness of virtual visit in the management of a large group of patients with common chronic neurological disorders.

Indexed as

COVID-19EpilepsyTelemedicineAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCommunicable Disease ControlFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPandemicsSARS-CoV-2Young AdultChronic neurologic disordersContinuity of careCOVID-19NeurologyTelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID33774762
PMCPMC8003890
OpenAlexW3150914784

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.