Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33774746›Full record

ArticleLangenbeck's archives of surgery2021

Enhanced recovery after pancreatoduodenectomy-does age have a bearing?

Deeksha Kapoor, Azhar Perwaiz, Amanjeet Singh, Arun N Kumar, Adarsh Chaudhary

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Deeksha KapoorDivision of GI Surgery, GI Oncology, Minimal Access and Bariatric Surgery, Institute of Digestive and Hepatobiliary Sciences, Medanta - the Medicity, Sector 38, Gurugram, Haryana, 122001, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3056-634X
Azhar PerwaizDivision of GI Surgery, GI Oncology, Minimal Access and Bariatric Surgery, Institute of Digestive and Hepatobiliary Sciences, Medanta - the Medicity, Sector 38, Gurugram, Haryana, 122001, India.
Amanjeet SinghDivision of GI Surgery, GI Oncology, Minimal Access and Bariatric Surgery, Institute of Digestive and Hepatobiliary Sciences, Medanta - the Medicity, Sector 38, Gurugram, Haryana, 122001, India.
Arun N KumarBapuji Dental College and Hospital, Davangere, Karnataka, 577004, India.
Adarsh ChaudharyDivision of GI Surgery, GI Oncology, Minimal Access and Bariatric Surgery, Institute of Digestive and Hepatobiliary Sciences, Medanta - the Medicity, Sector 38, Gurugram, Haryana, 122001, India. adarsh_chaudhary@yahoo.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3066-4564

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionWith the proven benefits of enhanced recovery protocols (ERP) after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD), their implementation has become a well-accepted clinical practice across the major pancreatic surgery centres of the world. The impact of age on the execution of ERP has remained an area of ambiguity. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of age on the feasibility of various postoperative elements of ERP after PD.

methodsA retrospective study was conducted which included 548 patients undergoing PD, managed using ERP, from March 2013 to September 2020. Patients were divided into two groups: < 70 years and ≥ 70 years. Compliance to recovery parameters and postoperative outcomes, including, the incidence of major complications, length of stay (LOS), mortality rates and re-admissions, were compared between the two groups. The impact of age, as a continuous variable, was also studied on the feasibility of each postoperative element.

resultsOne-fifth (113/548) of the cohort comprised of patients aged 70 years and above. The 'elderly' patients had a significantly higher prevalence of diabetes, hypertension, and cardiac disease. They were also more likely to get admitted to the intensive care unit for postoperative monitoring (p < 0.001). The median LOS was 8.0 days in the young and 9.0 days in the elderly (p = 0.253). Rate of major complications (age < 70, n = 37 (8.5%) vs age ≥ 70, n = 7 (6.2%), p = 0.421) and 30-day mortality (age < 70, n = 15 (3.4%) vs age ≥ 70, n = 7 (6.2%), p = 0.185) was not statistically different between the two groups. Compliance of various postoperative elements was similar between the two groups. When studied as a continuous variable, age did not seem to be associated with higher non-compliance of any of the postoperative recovery elements.

conclusionAge is not a barrier in the safe implementation of postoperative element of ERPs after PD. Enhanced recovery protocols do not need to be modified for the aged.

Indexed as

LaparoscopyPancreaticoduodenectomyAgedHumansLength of StayPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesElderlyEnhanced recovery pathwayOutcomesPancreatoduodenectomy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.