Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33774726›Full record

SynthesisArchives of dermatological research2022

Efficacy and safety of tetracyclines for pemphigoid: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Xin-Xing Jin, Xue Wang, Ying Shan, Si-Zhe Li, Qun Xu, Hong-Zhong Jin, Ya-Gang Zuo

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Archives of dermatological research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xin-Xing JinDepartment of Dermatology, National Clinical Research Center for Dermatologic and Immunologic Diseases, Translational Medicine Center, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, No. 1, shuaifuyuan hutong, Dongcheng district, Beijing, 100730, China.
Xue WangDepartment of Allergy, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China.
Ying ShanDepartment of Dermatology, National Clinical Research Center for Dermatologic and Immunologic Diseases, Translational Medicine Center, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, No. 1, shuaifuyuan hutong, Dongcheng district, Beijing, 100730, China.
Si-Zhe LiDepartment of Dermatology, National Clinical Research Center for Dermatologic and Immunologic Diseases, Translational Medicine Center, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, No. 1, shuaifuyuan hutong, Dongcheng district, Beijing, 100730, China.
Qun XuDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Basic Medicine Peking Union Medical College, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100005, China.
Hong-Zhong JinDepartment of Dermatology, National Clinical Research Center for Dermatologic and Immunologic Diseases, Translational Medicine Center, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, No. 1, shuaifuyuan hutong, Dongcheng district, Beijing, 100730, China.
Ya-Gang ZuoDepartment of Dermatology, National Clinical Research Center for Dermatologic and Immunologic Diseases, Translational Medicine Center, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, No. 1, shuaifuyuan hutong, Dongcheng district, Beijing, 100730, China. zuoyagang@263.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2526-4331
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNHebei North University · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 81972944Natural Science Foundation of Beijing Municipality 7192166
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this review was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tetracyclines for treatment of pemphigoid. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Ovid, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library for studies involving pemphigoid patients treated with tetracyclines published in English before 29 February 2020. References of included studies were also screened to widen the scope of the literature search. Data regarding predefined clinical outcomes of 341 patients from 77 studies were extracted and analyzed. A meta-analysis was conducted on the basis of 4 studies including 2 randomized controlled trials and 2 comparative studies. The patients had a mean age of 74.60 ± 13.18 years, 45.4% were males, and 54.6% were females. There were 185 patients with mild-to-moderate and 143 patients with severe disease. The average initial doses were 1.62 ± 0.39 g/day for tetracycline, 0.20 ± 0.01 g/day for doxycycline, and 0.11 ± 0.05 g/day for minocycline. The average time on tetracyclines was 3.74 ± 5.99 months, and 261 (81.3%) patients reported partial or complete remission. Relapses occurred in 72 (28.3%) cases. Adverse effects were experienced by 130 (41.9%) patients. The pooled ORs for short-term effectiveness, relapse, adverse effects, and 1-year survival in patients treated with oral tetracyclines vs. systemic corticosteroids were 0.40 (95% CI, 0.22-0.76), 0.69 (95% CI, 0.44-1.10), 0.47 (95% CI, 0.27-0.82) and 2.02 (95% CI, 1.16-3.50), respectively. Compared to doxycycline and minocycline, tetracycline was significantly associated with better treatment outcomes and fewer adverse effects (p < 0.05). This review revealed tetracyclines' efficacy and safety in pemphigoid treatment and may offer support for clinical use of tetracyclines in pemphigoid.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsHumansPemphigoid, BullousRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTetracyclinesAnti-Bacterial AgentsTetracyclinesCorticosteroidsMeta-analysisPemphigoidTetracyclinesTreatment

Identifiers

PMID33774726
OpenAlexW3147665664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.