ArticleBiochemical and biophysical research communications2021
Modulation of plant DNA damage response gene expression during Agrobacterium infection.
Article in Biochemical and biophysical research communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Agrobacterium-Mediated Transformation for the Development of Transgenic Crops; Present and Future Prospects.Molecular biotechnology · 2024Review
- The translocated virulence protein VirD5 causes DNA damage and mutation duringScience advances · 2022Article
- Genetic factors governing bacterial virulence and host plant susceptibility duringAdvances in genetics · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Agrobacterium T-DNA (transfer DNA) integration into the plant genome relies mostly on host proteins involved in the DNA damage repair pathways. However, conflicting results have been obtained using plants with mutated or down-regulated genes involved in these pathways. Here, we chose a different approach by following the expression of a series of genes, encoding proteins involved in the DNA damage response, during early stages of Agrobacterium infection in tobacco. First, we identified tobacco homologs of Arabidopsis genes induced upon DNA damage and demonstrated that their expression was activated by bleomycin, a DNA-break causing agent. Then, we showed that Agrobacterium infection induces the expression of several of these genes markers of the host DNA damage response, with different patterns of transcriptional response. This induction largely depends on Agrobacterium virulence factors, but not on the T-DNA, suggesting that the DNA damage response activation may rely on Agrobacterium-encoded virulence proteins. Our results suggest that Agrobacterium modulates the plant DNA damage response machinery, which might facilitate the integration of the bacterial T-DNA into the DNA breaks in the host genome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.