Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33774207›Full record

ArticleBrain stimulation

Entrainment of cerebellar Purkinje cell spiking activity using pulsed ultrasound stimulation.

Ahmet S Asan, Qi Kang, Ömer Oralkan, Mesut Sahin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain stimulation. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ahmet S AsanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, NJ, USA.
Qi KangDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, NJ, USA.
Ömer OralkanDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, NC State University, Raleigh, NC, USA.
Mesut SahinDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, NJ, USA. Electronic address: sahin@njit.edu.
New Jersey Institute of Technology · USNorth Carolina State University · US

Funding

A whole-brain ultrasonic neural stimulation and photoacoustic recording system in behaving animalsR21EY028456 · NEI · NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY RALEIGH · PI ORALKAN, OMER, SAHIN, MESUT · 2017 to 2018
$437k
Electrical and Ultrasonic Modulation of Lateral Cerebellar NucleusR21NS125349 · NINDS · NEW JERSEY INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI SAHIN, MESUT · 2021 to 2021
$217k
NEI NIH HHS R21 EY028456NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS125349
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFocused ultrasound (FUS) has excellent characteristics over other non-invasive stimulation methods in terms of spatial resolution and steering capability of the target. FUS has not been tested in the cerebellar cortex and cellular effects of FUS are not fully understood. OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS: To investigate how the activity of cerebellar Purkinje cells (PCs) is modulated by FUS with varying pulse durations and pulse repetition frequencies.

methodsA glass microelectrode was inserted into the cerebellar vermis lobule 6 from the dorsal side to extracellularly record single unit activity of the PCs in anesthetized rats. Ultrasonic stimulation (500 kHz) was applied through a coupling cone, filled with degassed water, from the posterior side to target the recording area with varying pulse durations and frequencies.

resultsSimple spike (SS) activity of PCs was entrained by the FUS pattern where the probability of spike occurrences peaked at around 1 ms following the onset of the stimulus regardless of its duration (0.5, 1, or 2 ms). The level of entrainment was stronger with shorter pulse durations at 50-Hz pulse repetition frequency (PRF), however, peri-event histograms spread wider and the peaks delayed slightly at 100-Hz PRF, suggesting involvement of a long-lasting inhibitory mechanism. There was no significant difference between the average firing rates in the baseline and stimulation periods.

conclusionFUS can entrain spiking activity of single cells on a spike-by-spike basis as demonstrated here in the rat cerebellar cortex. The observed modulation potentially results from the aggregate of excitatory and inhibitory effects of FUS on the entire cortical network rather than on the PCs alone.

Indexed as

Cerebellar CortexPurkinje CellsAction PotentialsAnimalsCerebral CortexRatsUltrasonic WavesCerebellar cortexFocused ultrasound stimulationNeuromodulation

Identifiers

PMID33774207
PMCPMC8164992
OpenAlexW3139163743

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.