ArticleTrends in parasitology2021
Raising the Bar(-seq) in Leishmania Genetic Screens.
Article in Trends in parasitology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Genome deletions to overcome the directed loss of gene function inFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Our understanding of regulatory factors in Leishmania differentiation has long been restricted by the available genetic tools, but the availability of CRISPR/Cas9 has changed the landscape forever. Recently, Baker and Catta-Preta et al. applied Cas9 editing and kinome-wide bar-seq to dissect the function of 204 kinases in the Leishmania mexicana life cycle.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33773911What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.