Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33773079›Full record

ArticleInfluenza and other respiratory viruses2021

A mixed methods study of seasonal influenza vaccine hesitancy in adults with chronic respiratory conditions.

Lynn Williams, Karen Deakin, Allyson Gallant, Susan Rasmussen, David Young, Nicola Cogan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Influenza and other respiratory viruses, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Journal of preventive medicine and hygiene · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lynn WilliamsSchool of Psychological Sciences and Health, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2735-9219
Karen DeakinSchool of Psychological Sciences and Health, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK.
Allyson GallantFaculty of Health, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Susan RasmussenSchool of Psychological Sciences and Health, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK.
David YoungDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK.
Nicola CoganSchool of Psychological Sciences and Health, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK.

Funding

Chief Scientist Office HIPS/18/37
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSeasonal influenza vaccination is recommended for patients with chronic respiratory conditions, but uptake is suboptimal. We undertook a comprehensive mixed methods study in order to examine the barriers and enablers to influenza vaccination in patients with chronic respiratory conditions.

methodsMixed methods including a survey (n = 429) which assessed sociodemographics and the psychological factors associated with vaccine uptake (ie confidence, complacency, constraints, calculation and collective responsibility) with binary logistic regression analysis. We also undertook focus groups and interviews (n = 59) to further explore barriers and enablers to uptake using thematic analysis.

resultsThe survey analysis identified that older participants were more likely to accept the vaccine, as were those with higher perceptions of collective responsibility around vaccination, lower levels of complacency and lower levels of constraints. Thematic analysis showed that concerns over vaccine side effects, lack of tailored information and knowledge, and a lack of trust and rapport with healthcare professionals were key barriers. In contrast, the importance of feeling protected, acceptance of being part of an at-risk group and feeling a reduced sense of vulnerability after vaccination were seen as key enablers.

conclusionsOur findings showed that the decision to accept a vaccine against influenza is influenced by multiple sociodemographic and psychological factors. Future interventions should provide clear and transparent information about side effects and be tailored to patients with chronic respiratory conditions. Interactions between patients and their healthcare providers have a particularly important role to play in helping patients address their concerns and feel confident in vaccination.

Indexed as

Influenza, HumanInfluenza VaccinesAdultHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth PersonnelHumansSeasonsVaccinationInfluenza Vaccinescomplacencyinfluenzamixed methodstrustvaccine hesitancy

Identifiers

PMID33773079
PMCPMC8404050

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.