Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33773064›Full record

ArticleAnatomical record (Hoboken, N.J. : 2007)2021

Sagittal suture morphological variation in human archaeological populations.

Olivia Cheronet, Abigail Ash, Alexandra Anders, János Dani, László Domboróczki, Eva Drozdova, Michael Francken, Marija Jovanovic, Lidija Milasinovic, Ildiko Pap and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Anatomical record (Hoboken, N.J. : 2007), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Olivia CheronetDepartment of Evolutionary Anthropology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-6760-1204
Abigail AshDepartment of Archaeology, University of York, York, UK.
Alexandra AndersInstitute of Archeological Sciences, Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary.
János DaniDéri Museum, Debrecen, Hungary.
László DomboróczkiIstván Dobó Castle Museum, Eger, Hungary.
Eva DrozdovaDepartment of Experimental Biology, Section of Genetics and Molecular Biology, Laboratory of Biological and Molecular Anthropology, Faculty of Science, Masaryk Univerzity, Brno, Czech Republic.
Michael FranckenOsteology, State Office for Cultural Heritage Baden-Wuerttemberg, Constance, Germany.
Marija JovanovicMuseum of Vojvodina, Novi Sad, Vojvodina, Republic of Serbia.
Lidija MilasinovicNational Museum of Kikinda, Kikinda, Republic of Serbia.
Ildiko PapDepartment of Anthropology, Hungarian Natural History Museum, Budapest, Hungary.
Pál RaczkyInstitute of Archeological Sciences, Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary.
Maria Teschler-NicolaDepartment of Evolutionary Anthropology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Zdeněk TvrdýAnthropos Institute, Moravian Museum, Brno, Czech Republic.
Joachim WahlInstitut für Naturwissenschaftliche Archäologie Abteilung Paläoanthropologie, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Gunita ZariņaUniversity of Latvia, Institute of Latvian History, Riga, Latvia.
Ron PinhasiDepartment of Evolutionary Anthropology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Funding

Czech Ministry of Culture MK000094862European Research Council ERC-2010-StG 263441
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cranial sutures join the many bones of the skull. They are therefore points of weakness and consequently subjected to the many mechanical stresses affecting the cranium. However, the way in which this impacts their morphological complexity remains unclear. We examine the intrinsic and extrinsic mechanisms of human sagittal sutures by quantifying the morphology from 107 individuals from archaeological populations spanning the Mesolithic to Middle ages, using standardized two-dimensional photographs. Results show that the most important factor determining sutural complexity appears to be the position along the cranial vault from the junction with the coronal suture at its anterior-most point to the junction with the lambdoid suture at its posterior-most point. Conversely, factors such as age and lifeways show few trends in complexity, the most significant of which is a lower complexity in the sutures of Mesolithic individuals who consumed a tougher diet. The simple technique used in this study therefore allowed us to identify that, taken together, structural aspects play a more important role in defining the complexity of the human sagittal suture than extrinsic factors such as the mechanical forces imposed on the cranium by individuals' diet.

Indexed as

Cranial SuturesArchaeologyHeadHumansSkullSuturesarchaeologymorphologyquantificationsagittal suture

Identifiers

PMID33773064
PMCPMC9291749

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.