Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33772952›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2021

Automated fusion of multimodal imaging data for identifying epileptogenic lesions in patients with inconclusive magnetic resonance imaging.

Radek Mareček, Pavel Říha, Michaela Bartoňová, Martin Kojan, Martin Lamoš, Martin Gajdoš, Lubomír Vojtíšek, Michal Mikl, Marek Bartoň, Irena Doležalová and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Radek MarečekCentral European Institute of Technology (CEITEC), Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-8399-3455
Pavel ŘíhaCentral European Institute of Technology (CEITEC), Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
Michaela BartoňováCentral European Institute of Technology (CEITEC), Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
Martin KojanCentral European Institute of Technology (CEITEC), Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
Martin LamošCentral European Institute of Technology (CEITEC), Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
Martin GajdošCentral European Institute of Technology (CEITEC), Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
Lubomír VojtíšekCentral European Institute of Technology (CEITEC), Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-4027-6568
Michal MiklCentral European Institute of Technology (CEITEC), Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0003-1190-346X
Marek BartoňCentral European Institute of Technology (CEITEC), Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
Irena DoležalováBrno Epilepsy Center, First Department of Neurology, St. Anne's University Hospital and Medical Faculty of Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
Martin PailBrno Epilepsy Center, First Department of Neurology, St. Anne's University Hospital and Medical Faculty of Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
Ondřej StrýčekCentral European Institute of Technology (CEITEC), Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
Marta PažourkováBrno Epilepsy Center, First Department of Neurology, St. Anne's University Hospital and Medical Faculty of Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
Milan BrázdilCentral European Institute of Technology (CEITEC), Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
Ivan RektorCentral European Institute of Technology (CEITEC), Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many methods applied to data acquired by various imaging modalities have been evaluated for their benefit in localizing lesions in magnetic resonance (MR) negative epilepsy patients. No approach has proven to be a stand-alone method with sufficiently high sensitivity and specificity. The presented study addresses the potential benefit of the automated fusion of results of individual methods in presurgical evaluation. We collected electrophysiological, MR, and nuclear imaging data from 137 patients with pharmacoresistant MR-negative/inconclusive focal epilepsy. A subgroup of 32 patients underwent surgical treatment with known postsurgical outcomes and histopathology. We employed a Gaussian mixture model to reveal several classes of gray matter tissue. Classes specific to epileptogenic tissue were identified and validated using the surgery subgroup divided into two disjoint sets. We evaluated the classification accuracy of the proposed method at a voxel-wise level and assessed the effect of individual methods. The training of the classifier resulted in six classes of gray matter tissue. We found a subset of two classes specific to tissue located in resected areas. The average classification accuracy (i.e., the probability of correct classification) was significantly higher than the level of chance in the training group (0.73) and even better in the validation surgery subgroup (0.82). Nuclear imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging, and source localization of interictal epileptic discharges were the strongest methods for classification accuracy. We showed that the automatic fusion of results can identify brain areas that show epileptogenic gray matter tissue features. The method might enhance the presurgical evaluations of MR-negative epilepsy patients.

Indexed as

AdultElectroencephalographyEpilepsies, PartialFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMultimodal ImagingNeuroimagingPositron-Emission TomographyTomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photondata fusionneuroimagingnonlesional epilepsyseizure onset zone

Identifiers

PMID33772952
PMCPMC8127142

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.