Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33772802›Full record

ArticlePerspectives in psychiatric care2022

Factors associated with antenatal depression during the COVID-19 (SARS-CoV2) pandemic: A cross-sectional study in a cohort of Turkish pregnant women.

Oznur Korukcu, Meltem Ozkaya, Omer Faruk Boran, Murat Bakacak

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Perspectives in psychiatric care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. The Impact of COVID-19 Related Distress on Antenatal Depression in Australia.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Oznur KorukcuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecological Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Akdeniz University, Antalya, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5840-9114
Meltem OzkayaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecological Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Akdeniz University, Antalya, Turkey.
Omer Faruk BoranDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Faculty of Medicine, Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam University, Kahramanmaras, Turkey.
Murat BakacakDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Faculty of Medicine, Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam University, Kahramanmaras, Turkey.
Akdeniz University · TRKahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo determine the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on antenatal depression in Turkish pregnant women. DESIGN AND

methodsIn this cross-sectional study, data were collected from 497 pregnant women between May and July 2020 using the Edinburgh Depression Scale (EDS) to determine the effect of obstetrics history, fear of hospitalization, concerns about the pandemic, birth, and the health of both mother and infant, on antenatal depression during the COVID-19 outbreak in Turkey.

findingsThe general EDS mean score of the total group was determined as mean 13.70 ± 6.22, which was higher than the critical cutoff point of 13. According to the multiple linear regression model applied in the study, the best predictive variables for the mean EDS score were determined to be concerned about completing a healthy pregnancy (r = -0.45), social media and news programs related to COVID-19 increasing levels of concern (r = -0.31), fear of hospitalization as the birth approaches (r = -0.45), having bad dreams during the COVID-19 pandemic (r = -0.41), the request for an elective cesarean delivery because of fear of catching COVID-19 (r = -0.40), fear of breastfeeding the infant (r = -0.45), and concerns that their own health would be negatively affected because of the pandemic (r = - 0.39), and these variables affected the mean EDS score negatively (total variance 40.5%, R = 0.642). PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: The COVID-19 pandemic has created an urgent need to implement specific antenatal programs to promote the psychological health of pregnant women and reduce antenatal depression during this or similar crises.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsAnxietyCross-Sectional StudiesDepressionFemaleHumansParturitionPregnancyPregnant PeopleRNA, ViralSARS-CoV-2Stress, PsychologicalSurveys and QuestionnairesTurkeyRNA, ViralCOVID-19 pandemicoutbreakperinatal depressionperinatal mood disorderSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID33772802
PMCPMC8251216
OpenAlexW3151720779

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.