ArticleVox sanguinis2021
Lessons learned in the collection of convalescent plasma during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Article in Vox sanguinis, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- SARS-CoV-2 convalescent plasma for the controlled clinical trial "COVIC-19": Experience from collection of very high-titer plasma from superimmunized individuals.Transfusion · 2025Trial
- Hyperimmune Plasma and Immunoglobulins against COVID-19: A Narrative Review.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- The role of convalescent plasma and hyperimmune immunoglobulins in the COVID-19 pandemic, including implications for future preparedness.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Review
- Review of therapeutic mechanisms and applications based on SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies.Frontiers in microbiology · 2023Review
- Blood plasma supply chain planning to respond COVID-19 pandemic: a case study.Environment, development and sustainability · 2022Article
- Plasma procurement and plasma product safety in light of the COVID-19 pandemic from the perspective of the plasma industry.Vox sanguinis · 2022Review
- International Society of Blood Transfusion survey of experiences of blood banks and transfusion services during the COVID-19 pandemic.Vox sanguinis · 2022Article
- Analysis of responses of the health care workers recovered from COVID-19 on convalescent plasma donation by apheresis: A single-center survey study.Journal of clinical apheresis · 2022Article
- Surrogate test performance for SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies (nAbs) for convalescent plasma (CCP): How useful could they be?Transfusion · 2021Article
- Convalescent Covid-19 plasma: Back-to-basics and ethics, and next steps.Transfusion clinique et biologique : journal de la Societe francaise de transfusion sanguine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors at 20 institutions in 12 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe lack of definitive treatment or preventative options for COVID-19 led many clinicians early on to consider convalescent plasma (CCP) as potentially therapeutic. Regulators, blood centres and hospitals worldwide worked quickly to get CCP to the bedside. Although response was admirable, several areas have been identified to help improve future pandemic management. MATERIALS AND
methodsA multidisciplinary, multinational subgroup from the ISBT Working Group on COVID-19 was tasked with drafting a manuscript that describes the lessons learned pertaining to procurement and administration of CCP, derived from a comprehensive questionnaire within the subgroup.
resultsWhile each country's responses and preparedness for the pandemic varied, there were shared challenges, spanning supply chain disruptions, staffing, impact of social distancing on the collection of regular blood and CCP products, and the availability of screening and confirmatory SARS-CoV-2 testing for donors and patients. The lack of a general framework to organize data gathering across clinical trials and the desire to provide a potentially life-saving therapeutic through compassionate use hampered the collection of much-needed safety and outcome data worldwide. Communication across all stakeholders was identified as being central to reducing confusion.
conclusionThe need for flexibility and adaptability remains paramount when dealing with a pandemic. As the world approaches the first anniversary of the COVID-19 pandemic with rising rates worldwide and over 115 million cases and 2·55 million deaths, respectively, it is important to reflect on how to better prepare for future pandemics as we continue to combat the current one.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.