Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33772740›Full record

ReviewActa neurologica Belgica2021

Posttraumatic functional movement disorders and litigation.

P Santens, A Bruggeman

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Acta neurologica Belgica, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 96% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

P SantensDepartment of Neurology, Ghent University Hospital, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium. patrick.santens@ugent.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8886-9776
A BruggemanDepartment of Neurology, Ghent University Hospital, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Ghent University Hospital · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The concept of functional movement disorders has evolved considerably over the past few decades. More specifically, the views on the relation with psychological stressors or personality disorders have substantially changed, emphasizing a shift from the previously dominant dualistic scheme. This evolution is reflected in adaptations to diagnostic criteria and management approaches. Functional movement disorders which arise in a close temporal relationship with a peripheral trauma are specifically challenging with respect to diagnosis and treatment, but similar considerations seem to apply. The relationship of functional disorders with trauma appears to be much closer than is often thought. Clinical and pathophysiological research has identified shared factors underlying functional posttraumatic as well as primary movement disorders. These evolving insights impact on discussions in terms of litigation for compensation after trauma. The literature is reviewed and the consequences for argumentation in litigation are outlined, including ethical and legal considerations. Finally, we formulate a number of recommendations.

Indexed as

HumansJurisprudenceMovement DisordersStress Disorders, Post-TraumaticEthicsFunctional movement disorderLitigationPosttraumatic disorder

Identifiers

PMID33772740
OpenAlexW3149476809

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.