Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33772671›Full record

SynthesisClinical autonomic research : official journal of the Clinical Autonomic Research Society2021

How to diagnose and measure primary hyperhidrosis: a systematic review of the literature.

Mattias A S Henning, Linnea Thorlacius, Kristina S Ibler, Gregor B E Jemec

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical autonomic research : official journal of the Clinical Autonomic Research Society, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07788326 (20% Alcohol With Steroid Local Anesthetic Technique Versus Steroid Local Anesthetic Technique Only in Stellate Ganglion Injection in Idiopathic Palmar Hyperhydrosis), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07788326 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

20% Alcohol With Steroid Local Anesthetic Technique Versus Steroid Local Anesthetic Technique Only in Stellate Ganglion Injection in Idiopathic Palmar Hyperhydrosis: A Controlled Randomised Study.

TypeinterventionalSponsorFayoum University HospitalRan2026 to 2027Enrolled50ConditionsHyperhidrosisArmsGroup A, Group B
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Primary hyperhidrosis: From a genetics point of view.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2023
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The temporal association of hyperhidrosis and its comorbidities - a nationwide hospital-based cohort study.Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mattias A S HenningDepartment of Dermatology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Zealand University Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. maahe@regionsjaelland.dk.ORCID 0000-0003-1991-2248
Linnea ThorlaciusDepartment of Dermatology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Zealand University Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-3734-9607
Kristina S Ibler *Department of Dermatology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Zealand University Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-5324-1591
Gregor B E Jemec *Department of Dermatology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Zealand University Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-0712-2540
University of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

LEO Fondet (DK) LF 18002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeHyperhidrosis (i.e. excessive sweating) is diagnosed from patient medical history and physical examination. In addition, focal sweat measurements can substantiate the hyperhidrosis diagnosis. Likewise, the impact of living with hyperhidrosis can be assessed with patient-reported outcome measures. However, no consensus exists on how to diagnose hyperhidrosis, how to quantify the disease, or how to measure the impact hyperhidrosis has on patients. Therefore, the objective of this review was to summarize the literature on diagnostic criteria, focal sweat measurement methods, and patient-reported outcome measures of hyperhidrosis.

methodsA literature search of Cochrane Library, Embase, and PubMed was conducted. Studies that included and aimed at developing or validating hyperhidrosis diagnostic criteria, focal sweat measurement methods, or patient-reported outcome measures for individuals with hyperhidrosis were eligible for inclusion. The methodological quality of diagnostic accuracy studies about focal sweat measurement methods was determined using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2.

resultsOverall, 33 studies were included. We identified two sets of hyperhidrosis diagnostic criteria, one scale for assessment of severity of hyperhidrosis sweating, four focal sweat measurement methods, and 15 patient-reported outcome measures.

conclusionThe algorithm for diagnosing hyperhidrosis and focal sweat measurement methods needs validation in large cohorts. Most patient-reported outcome measures for hyperhidrosis are not adequately validated. A potential solution is to develop a core outcome set that can standardize outcomes reported in clinical trials.

Indexed as

HyperhidrosisHumansSweatSweatingClinimetryEvidence-based medicineHyperhidrosisPatient-reported outcome measureSweating

Identifiers

PMID33772671
OpenAlexW3149797107

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.