Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33772659›Full record

SynthesisEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2021

Sagittal balance of the cervical spine: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Parisa Azimi, Taravat Yazdanian, Edward C Benzel, Yong Hai, Ali Montazeri

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05374850 (Impact of Cervical Sagittal Parameters on Interlaminar Epidural Steroid Injection Treatment Outcomes in Patients With Cervical Disc Herniation), which is not on this map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05374850 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Impact of Cervical Sagittal Parameters on Interlaminar Epidural Steroid Injection Treatment Outcomes in Patients With Cervical Disc Herniation

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorMarmara UniversityRan2022 to 2022Enrolled60ConditionsCervical Disc HerniationArmsCervical Interlaminar Epidural Steroid Injection
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Spinopelvic measurements of sagittal balance with deep learning: systematic review and critical evaluation.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Choosing the right treatment for degenerative cervical myelopathy.Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. C4 constant vertebra: a novel benchmark of physiological cervical sagittal alignment.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. A novel classification that defines the normal cervical spine: an analysis based on 632 asymptomatic Chinese volunteers.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Emerging Technologies within Spine Surgery.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  20. Age-related changes in cervical sagittal alignment: based on 625 Chinese asymptomatic subjects.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Parisa AzimiNeuroscience Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Arabi Ave, Daneshjoo Blvd, Velenjak, 19839-63113, Tehran, Iran. parisa.azimi@gmail.com.
Taravat YazdanianSchool of Medicine, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Edward C BenzelDepartment of Neurosurgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Yong HaiDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Ali MontazeriMental Health Research Group, Health Metrics Research Centre, Iranian Institute for Health Sciences Research, ACECR, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the cervical sagittal parameters between patients with cervical spine disorder and asymptomatic controls.

methodsTwo independent authors systematically searched online databases including Pubmed, Scopus, Cochrane library, and Web of Science up to June 2020. Cervical sagittal balance parameters, such as T1 slope, cervical SVA (cSVA), and spine cranial angle (SCA), were compared between the cervical spine in healthy, symptomatic, and pre-operative participants. Where possible, we pooled data using random-effects meta-analysis, by CMA software. Heterogeneity and publication bias were assessed using the I-squared statistic and funnel plots, respectively.

resultsA total of 102 studies, comprising 13,802 cases (52.7% female), were included in this meta-analysis. We used the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) to evaluate the quality of studies included in this review. Funnel plot and Begg's test did not indicate obvious publication bias. The pooled analysis reveals that the mean (SD) values were: T1 slope (degree), 24.5 (0.98), 25.7 (0.99), 25.4 (0.34); cSVA (mm), 18.7 (1.76), 22.7 (0.66), 22.4 (0.68) for healthy population, symptomatic, and pre-operative assessment, respectively. The mean value of the SCA (degree) was 79.5 (3.55) and 75.6 (10.3) for healthy and symptomatic groups, respectively. Statistical differences were observed between the groups (all P values < 0.001).

conclusionThe findings showed that the T1 slope and the cSVA were significantly lower among patients with cervical spine disorder compared to controls and higher for the SCA. Further well-conducted studies are needed to complement our findings.

Indexed as

LordosisSpinal DiseasesCervical VertebraeFemaleHumansMaleNeckRetrospective StudiesSkullCervical spineCervical SVASagittal balanceSpine cranial angleT1 slope

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.